WPC  ?J.7e"*E*[}CߺeQ2r:X#&B?5L9M(+0UА\Y ̏4Pt7q&~«Xm o֭} @Zq۞y5g;ܞ:Vs~85MՁ kBvf_z%k0rNtXܽϞ{SSwěsUC{ _%nL?:D+H>yTUF;Zd/@y(_4ƶx]k-@c7TP'?(X`oL25Dú5avn:z&#ok?]d7)K)gB„ot21XMq;W= Mxr AؓFW ڄ (FSM0(-j̢kAʓB\ ckJ*D$`N'ENa5w*JyAUj.~ % r E$ D+& Q 0 0C AM$j 0U:Qo@/RMU2 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0}^ Q#!]N~^  0L m C D3 0> B8 BUUBr^ ^ Vjln| 0,^ ^ w@4,@%f^ 0^ ^ aP"^ ^ "U 0 Dd 0;;3M"g 0nU>6M)-------^ ^ ^ ^         "    "1 1 1 1 1 1  DCS  B- ^                         M <6X9`(Courier'    0 .   'dxd Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2)$ .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    ($     A<< c   )"UKUS.,(((  33B.++b >uQ!XB  _( E(2)$ .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    22A"HelveticaBoldWPC  9513 ,, !y}vH794?7463 52 51 40403/2/2.1.1- 0-0-0,/,/+?. . .  -  -  - ? ,  ,  ,  +  +? ? +  +  ?*  *  *  )  ?)  ) ?  )  ? )( ( ( ?( ' ?' ' ?' '&??& ??&  &    ?        ??     ?   ???    ?   ?   ?   ?     ? ?    ? ?   ? ?  ?    ?  ?  ?    ?  ?? ?  ? ?   ? ?  ?? ?  ?    ?   ??  ?   ?    ? ? ?     ?  ?? ?   ?   ???  ??  ? ? ?? ?? ??  ????   ???? ? ? ? ? ?  ??  ? ? ? ? ??  ?? ?? ?  ?  ?     ?   ?  ?  ? ? ? ?   ??   ?        ? ?  ??   ???  ? ? ? ? ? ? ?   ? ?? ??  ?? ?  ? ?  ? ??  ? ???  ?? ?  ? ?? ?  ?     ??     ??   ??  ???? ? ? ? x? ?8 ?? ? ?  ?? 8 ??  ? 8 ??  ?    | ??  <?   ? ??   ?  ???  ????  ???  ??|  ?  ???  ??  ??  ?  ?  ???  >?  <?  8?  0?   ???   ????   ???   ???   ?    ?   ??   ???  ? ??  ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?? ? ??? ? ?  ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ? ??? ???? ?  ? ? ?? ?? ??  ? ? ?  ?  ? ? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?  ??? ???????  ? ??? ?  ?8? ?~??<? ?8? ??8?? ?? 0??   ? ?`?? ?@??? ? ???? ? ?? ?? ??  ?  ?0 ??0? &?8 ?8 ??` ?  ?  ?? ?  ???????????? ?  ??????? ??  ? ?!?!8<>?~? |?| |?0 < >  ? ?? ? ? ???? ?? ?? ???????????????????   ?<? < x x     ?? ???0? ???$?$?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ??? ???????????? ???? ??? ??x ??  ?? ?  ?????? ?? ?"? "??  <?  ?  ??   ? ?  ? ? ???  ???  ??? ~ ??? @? ? ?p ?     @         ?  ? ? ? ? ???????@?? ??8??? |??? ???? ?? ?? ??    ?  ?    ?>?|? ? ? ? ??  ?? ? ?? ???????? ?? ? ??? ? ?? ?  ?  ? ? ?? ??p`?  ? ~? ~?~??~?????~????~???|???<??`8???8??0???0 ??  ?? ? ????? ?x ?x ?|? ??|? ? > ?  > ?? ? ? ? ??x ? ?|  ?~? ? ? ??  ??  ?? ? ?  ??? ? ???  ?? ?         ?        ?    ? ??  ???? ? ? ? ?    ?  ?   ??   ??         ??        ?  ?  ? ? ?  ?  ? |?  ? |? ?? ? < ?  >     ?? ??  ?? ??  ?       ??  ? ??? ? ?? ??  ? ? ?  ?      ?   ?? ?  ?  ?  ??  ? p ?   ? ?   ?    ?   ?   ?   ?  ??|? ? ???? ?? ??  ?  ???  ??  ??   ?~  ?| ? p ? ?? ? ?? ? ?  ??  ?   ?         ? ?   ?   ?      ?  ? ???   ???   ?? ?? ?? ?  ?? ?  ?   ?  ?  ?? ?  ?  ?     ?   ?  ?     ? ?   ??  ??  ?  ?   ?      ?    "? ?  " ?   ?  ? ?     ? ??  ?       ?    ?   ?  ?   ?? ?   ?  ?      ??     ?    ?    ??   ?     ?  ?   ?    ?    ??  ?  ??  ??  ?    ? ? ? ??       ? ?  ?  ? ?    ?      ? ? ?        ? ??  ? ?         ? |  >   ?       ? ? ? ???  ?? @?? ?   ??  ?  ? ? ? ?  ? ??       ??? ????    ? ?     ? ?        ?   ?  ?       ??  ? ???  ?    ?  ?   ??       ? ?           ?  ? ~  x  p   ? ? ?  ? ?  ?     ?         ?         ?? ? ? ? ??? ? ?? ? ?   * * `*?* )? ?)??))))))?'?'?'''' & &?  ' ? '  (  ) )? * ?*?+?,-J'%$# # " " !?  ?   q?   ?       ?   ?!33 ?!)( ( ' ?' ' & &?%%?%$$ # ?# ?# ? ? ???   ?  - -? ?- , , ?, , , , + +  +  +  ?+  *?  *!*!* "* #*3)3)?3)3)3)?3)3)3)2(?2(2(2(?2(2(2(2(2(1(?1(1(1(1(1(1(1)1A0A0A?0A?0A0A?0B0B1B1B1v) #UNLOGO.WPG H  )"UKUS.,(((  33B.++b >uQ!XB  _ !(  |!! EconomicandSocial  Council02A`Helvetica  )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _++?++ + 3 ;CK!++7?33 @  @ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/29  page  2  (2)$ .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB      )(UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _#*+33***XX++7*    2      :       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/29  **3**XJ!**XX3    2      :       page  2  (2)$ .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    H4heading 1heading 1&    5+* *bL6 ##5O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>'  `:Body Text InBody Text Indent 2  ;1**x  bL6 ##;O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>L6Block TextBlock Text      #wK5"$#O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>H4Body TextBody Text  &**6 ##&O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#><$2Body Text 2  ;1**x  bL6 ##;O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>ӵ!*HP LaserJet 1100,$$,0*.(>c$"Small Circle"0 U d$$$$'dxdP 8Body Text 2Body Text 2  2( ` hp x 2XXXW&\  `*Times New RomanTTW     UK  US     W'2 `*Times New RomanTTW>4X` hp x (#>   dK Kd\  `*Times New RomanTT'   +( ~ )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33 @  @ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/29  page  14  Annex13|ET<6X9`(Courierd6X@K@22A"HelveticaBoldh2p}wC22A"HelveticaBold2p}wC22A"HelveticaBold 2p}wC 02A`Helveticad`2PkCP02A`Helveticad 2PkCP/2A`Helveticadl2PkCP/2A`HelveticadV2PkCP02A`Helveticad2PkCP22A"HelveticaBold2p}wC(x$UKUS.,  TRW`6&W`6&6&A46&A4T  33+RB.++b >uQ!XB  ђr';x' TTTTTTETDTDTDTy\I*  )(UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  16     :  q       M       Annex2Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5H }'(3@$ .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    ݑ{'x~'TABLE ALevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 F )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/29  page  16  Annex2Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5     ѣ}'{' __ )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _ K )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  13  6K4heading 2     UK       US XXX    )(UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  14     :  q       M       Annex1&jg$1  N ;1 a  iq!y)";   UK  8. a  iq!y)"8   US     )(UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  16     :  q       M       Annex3      ] )'UKUS.,(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  12  <:Default ParaXXXXXX<6X9`(Courier New  GRSPLomonaco ISO OICA IMMASppliersCLEPA EEVCAIRBAGSairbag SEL dBCA ADUairbags ECE GRSG bisISOFIXisofixiFMVSSpictogram MBDJASIC JAMAEUROCAM MDB Ing$Kopernikusgrassesteinerpreloading ADR gtrcenterKNbiomechanical daNparagrapheCausfix E.C.nm +( +( +( +(          nnnn7Hairlinedxd)Hairline dff* .x!UKUS.,  TRV6&X3' Letter6&A43'T(((  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    _R?+33('  L*c* UEAz|" p @ H@E""?$'F dEF ??$'QG dEQG ?(  UNITED R NATIONS WGCz|2n ` @ H@E?2nJ?2n 9 ( 9! ??++7!    UEAz| R p @ H@E RR R    Distr.    GENERAL      TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/29    10July2001    π    Original:ENGLISH      ((6 (? 6  6XuP X 6ECONOMICCOMMISSIONFOREUROPEX6 X XXuP     #( XX6# m  X6 X(INLANDTRANSPORTCOMMITTEE#( XX6#   WorldForumforHarmonizationofVehicleRegulations(WP.29) E WorkingPartyonPassiveSafety(GRSP)+@k k 2REPORTOFTHEWORKINGPARTYONPASSIVESAFETY(GRSP) q @MM?ONITSTWENTYNINTHSESSION@AAD(711May2001)B++ + 3 ;CK!??B1.  GRSPhelditstwentyninthsessionfrom7May(afternoon)to % 11May(morning)2001underthechairmanshipofMr.C.Lomonaco(Italy).ExpertsfromthefollowingcountriesparticipatedintheworkfollowingRule1(a)oftheRulesofProcedureofWP.29(TRANS/WP.29/690):Australia;Canada;CzechRepublic;Finland;France;Germany;Hungary;Italy;Japan;Netherlands;Norway;Poland;Romania;RussianFederation;Spain;Sweden;Switzerland;UnitedKingdom;UnitedStatesofAmerica.ArepresentativeoftheEuropeanCommission(EC)participated.Expertsfromthefollowingnon-governmentalorganizationsparticipated:InternationalOrganizationforStandardization(ISO);InternationalTouringAlliance/InternationalAutomobileFederation(AIT/FIA);InternationalOrganizationofMotorVehicleManufacturers(OICA);InternationalMotorcycleManufacturersAssociation(IMMA);EuropeanAssociationofAutomotiveSuppliers(CLEPA);EuropeanEnhancedVehiclesafetyCommittee(EEVC);ConsumersInternational(CI).GE.01  ._+= c* c  c  RN++2.  Thedocumentswithoutasymboldistributedduringthesessionarelisted   inannex1tothisreport.  DRAFTREGULATIONONAIRBAGSDocumentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/4;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/5; kz TRANS/WP.29/2000/11.3.  Asannouncedduringthetwentyeighthsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,   para.5),expertsfromISOmadetwopresentationsoftheworkthathadbeenundertakenbytheUnitedStatesArmyResearchLaboratoryandbyISO.4.  Concerningthefirstpresentation,theexpertsaidthat,accordingto I X  theresearch,thecurrentmethodstodeterminetheeardamagesinhumanswerenotvalidandthatanewmathematicalmethodwasbeingdeveloped.Heconfirmedthatthefirstresultsofthisnewmethodshoweditsreliability,andtheexpertexpressedhishopethatafinalresultcouldbepresentedtoGRSPwithinayear.5.  Thesecondpresentation,relatedtothedevelopmentofanassessment '6  methodforairbagnoiseinmodernvehicles,wasbeingconductedbyISO.Asthemainconclusion,theexpertsaidthattherewerenodoubtsregardingthebenefitsofairbagsandthataregulatoryactionlimitingthenoiseproducedbyanairbagdeploymentwasprematureforthetimebeing.Inhisopinion,moretimewasnecessarytocompleteanexperimentalstudyandtofinalizerecommendedmeasurementpractice.HealsosaidthattheinvestigationbySAErelatingtothenoiseassociatedwithairbagdeploymentcouldbefoundintheSAEtechnicalpaperseriesunderNos.942218and983162.6.  GRSPthankedtheexpertsfromISOfortheirpresentationsandagreed * that,beforetakingadecision,theresearchersshouldfinishtheirwork.GRSPrequestedtheexpertstotransmittothesecretariatacopyoftheirpresentationstobeputontheGRSPwebpage.ItwasalsoagreedthatthisitemwouldonlybeconsideredagainattheDecember2002GRSPsession,expectingthatthefinalresultsoftheresearchwouldbeavailable.g*AMENDMENTSTOECEREGULATIONS(a)0  RegulationNo.11(Doorlatchesanddoorretentioncomponents)]l&## Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/1.  ( 7.  TheexpertfromOICAintroduceddocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/1asa %"4* basisforaglobaltechnicalregulation(gtr)thathisorganizationhadpresentedtoWP.29asoneoftheprioritiesfortheelaborationof_gtrs_.Thedocumentcontained,intheformofatable,thediscrepanciesamongstRegulationNo.11,thecorrespondingEuropeanCommunityDirective,andFMVSSNo.206.TheexpertexplainedtoGRSPthatthelastcolumnofthetablereflectedtheOICAproposalforthedraftgtr.Hesaidthatthemostrelevantdiscrepanciestoconsiderwerethescopeandthereardoorlatches.8.  TheChairmanremindedGRSPthatWP.29hadnotyetestablishedthe g(v#3 prioritiesfor_gtrs_,andannouncedhisintentiontoreporttoWP.29atitsJune2001session,inordertoobtainanadviceregardingthisnewpossiblegtr.  ,'9 (' ( (  (b)  RegulationNo14(Safetybeltanchorages)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/11;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/7; 3d TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/9andAdd.1;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/5;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/10;informaldocumentsNos.3,13,14,16,21and25ofannex1ofthisreport.9.  TheexpertfromOICApresentedinformaldocumentNo.3containinga   draftCorrigendumtoRegulationNo.14,inordertoacceptthatthereductionoftheminimumdistancebetweentheanchoragesoftherearcentrepositionofsafetybeltanchoragescouldbeappliedtoallkindsofseatsandnotonlytobenchseats.TheexpertfromSpainpresentedasimilarproposal(informaldocumentNo.16).10.  WiththeobjectionsbytheexpertsfromtheUnitedKingdomandfromCI,   GRSPadoptedtheproposal,ascontainedindocumentTRANS/WP.29/2001/26,whichhadbeenpreviouslypreparedbythesecretariatattherequestoftheGRSPChairman.ItwasconfirmedthattheproposalhadamajorityconsentbyGRSPandshouldbeconsideredbyWP.29andAC.1attheirJune2001sessions.11.  Concerningthedefinitionofaneffectiveanchorage,theexpertfrom   SpainintroducedinformaldocumentNo.25withanewwordingforparagraph2.4.ofRegulationNo.14.TheexpertfromRomaniapresentedinformaldocumentNo.13,whichcontainedhisremarkstotheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10.12.  TheexpertfromGermanystatedthat,inhisopinion,thecurrenttextof  paragraph2.4.oftheRegulationwasclearlydefiningtheeffectiveanchorage,andthatthedifficultiesfoundbytheexpertfromSpainweremorerelatedtothewordingofparagraphs2.4.1.to2.4.1.3.,wheredifferentexampleswereincluded.13.  GRSPagreedwiththeaboveexplanation,andrequestedtheexpertfrom @  Spaintoreformulatehisproposalkeepingparagraph2.4.unchanged,butconsideringnewwordingforparagraphs2.4.1.to2.4.1.3.14.  Concerningtheproposalforagtr(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/7,and $ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/9),theexpertfromOICAintroduceddocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/9/Add.1,whichupdatedhisproposalandcontainedthefiguresofannex3(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,para.36).Hesaidthathisorganizationwasconsideringtocreateagroupofexpertsonthesubjectinordertoaddressallthependingissuesraisedduringthetwentyeighthsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,paras.26to33and35).GRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationoftheproposalsconcernedatthenextsession.15.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomintroduceddocument $J- TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/5,whichincludedhisconcreteproposalsforthethreepointsafetybeltanchoragesineachforwardandrearwardseatingposition.HealsoindicatedthatdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/10wasaduplicationofhisproposalandshouldbedisregarded.16.  TheexpertfromOICAsuggestedthepossibilityofhavingagtron E(v#3 safetybeltanchorageswithmorethanonestrengthlevel,andtokeepthetwolowersafetybeltanchoragesforthosecountrieswhichwouldnotwanttoapplythemaximumlevelofseverity.TheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmericaexpressedhissupportforthisidea,buttheexpertsfromtheUnitedKingdomandCIwereagainstagtrwithdifferentlevelsofstringency.  q,'9 17.  TheexpertsfromItalyandSpainexpressedtheirviewsthattheconcept   ofthreepointsafetybeltanchoragesforfrontfacingseatingpositionscouldbequicklyagreed,buttheextensionofthethreepointsafetybeltsanchoragestorearfacingseatswouldbemoredifficulttoaccept.18.  TheChairmanrequestedtheexpertfromOICAtorevisehisproposal, Iz showinginthetextthealternativesolutionsproposedbyvariousexpertsduringthediscussion,andsuggestedtoconsideritattheDecember2001session.HealsoannouncedhisintentiontoreporttoWP.29togetanadviceonthepossibilityofelaboratingagtrwithseverallevelsofstringency.19.  ConcerningtheISOFIXsystem,theexpertfromFrance,whohadbeen u   requestedtoprepareanupdatedproposalfortheaffectedRegulations,introducedinformaldocumentsNos.21(RegulationNo.14);23(RegulationNo.44);and22(RegulationNo.16).HealsoannouncedtoGRSPthatthecomplementaryproposalsforthesecondstep(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,paras.15to17)wouldprobablybereadyforthenextGRSPsession.20.  HestressedtheurgencyoftheadoptionoftheISOFIXsystem,andto S  advancequickly,heofferedtoorganizeadraftinggroupinordertopreparethedefinitiveproposalsforthethreementionedRegulations.Hesuggestedatwodaymeeting,18and19October20001,inParis.Haalsosaidthat,concerningthequestionofchildrestraintrotation,ISOhadmadesignificantprogressandthat,inhisview,theISOworkshouldbetakenintoaccountwhendraftingthedefinitiveproposals.21.  TheexpertfromISOreportedonthestateoftheworkofISOFIXworking  group1andexplainedtoGRSPthataFrenchresearchhadbeenconsidered.HesaidthatacomparisonhadbeenmadeofdifferentISOFIXsystemsforforwardfacingandrearfacingpositions.HeconcludedthatanISOFIXwith_twoTTTTrigid_pointsandwithachildrestraintsystem(_CRS_)withshieldandthreepointsafetybelthadobtainedasatisfactoryperformanceinbothheadexcursionandthoraxacceleration,andthatonlyatwopointsafetybeltforboth_CRS_Ԁwithshieldandfivepointharnesswithoutatoptetherhadshownheadexcursionexceedingthelimits.22.  HealsoinformedGRSPthatforatwopointISOFIXsystemwitha_CRS_Ԁwith $ afivepointharnessandatoptether,theheadexcursionwaswellcontrolled,butthatneckloadsandchestaccelerationhadincreased.HesaidthatforanISOFIXsystemwithtwopointsupportandintherearfacingposition,theneckloadswerereduced,butthatalowerstrapwasneededinthecaseofarearimpact.HefinallysaidthatithadbeendemonstratedthatanenlargementzoneforISOFIXattachmentshadbeenconsiderednecessarybytheresearchers.23.  TheexpertfromEEVCconfirmedthatapossibleenlargedzonehadno g#, influenceinlateralimpacts.TheexpertfromtheNetherlandswantedtobeinformediftheresearchhadconsideredtheseatasthethirdsupportforISOFIXsystems.24.  GRSPthankedtheexpertfromISOandkindlyrequestedhimtotransmitto &"1 thesecretariatacopyofhispresentationtobeputinthewebpage.25.  AttherequestoftheexpertfromCI,theexpertfromFranceclarified (($4 thatthevalueof720mmastheminimumvaluechosenbetweenthefrontandrearseatpitchfortheexceptiontoinstallISOFIXanchoragesintherearseatrow(informaldocumentNo.21,para.5.3.10.1.2.)hadbeenchosenwithouttesting,butthatthisvaluehadbeenconsiderednormal,whendraftingtheproposal. #-T(: g* g  g  26.  GRSPagreedtocontinuetheconsiderationofinformaldocumentNo.21,  jointlywiththeproposalexpectedtobesubmittedbyFrance(seepara.20above),attheDecember2001session.Toallowamoredetailedconsiderationoftheproposal,thesecretariatwasrequestedtodistributeinformaldocumentNo.21withanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.27.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomintroducedinformaldocumentNo.14 , containingpossibleamendmentstothestrengthofanchoragesforminibuses.HesaidthattwopossibleapproachescouldbeenvisagedeithertheadaptationofcurrentsafetybeltanchoragepulltestrequirementstorequireminibusestohavethesameanchoragestrengthasrequiredforcarsinRegulationNo.14,ortoadopttheAustraliancoachfloor/seatregulationADR68.Heannouncedthatthecompleteworkwouldbepresentedatthetechnicalconferenceontheenhancedsafetyofvehicles(_ESV_),tobeheldintheNetherlandsinJune.28.  TheexpertsfromItalyandOICApointedoutthat,beforeamendingthe   Regulation,acostbenefitanalysisandaccidentdatashoulddemonstrateitsbenefit.GRSPagreedthat,followingthepresentationatthe_ESV_ԀConference,thisissuecouldbeconsideredattheDecember2001session,attherequestoftheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdom.(c)  RegulationNo.16(Safetybelts) L Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/2;;informal  documentsNos.5,6,9,10,17,22,27,28and29ofannex1tothisreport.29.  TheexpertfromFranceintroducedinformaldocumentNo.22,which  containedtheamendmentstotheRegulationtoincludetheprescriptionsforISOFIXsystems.AsagreedforRegulationNo.14,thesecretariatwasrequestedtodistributeinformaldocumentNo.22withanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.30.  Concerningthereductionoftheretractionforcelimit ! (TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12),theexpertfromJapanexplainedtoGRSPthat,aftercarryingoutsometests,ithadbeendemonstratedthatthereductionoftheretractionforcedidnotimplyanyreductionofthesecuritylevelofpassengers(informaldocumentsNos.5and6).31.  Someexpertsexpressedtheirconcernsaboutthereductionof50percent ' intheretractionforceandanother50percentreductionafterthedurabilitytestinbothcaseswhenthesafetybeltswereequippedornotwithtensionreducingdevices.32.  Inordertoreplytotheabovementionedconcerns,theexpertfromJapan g#, tabledinformaldocumentsNos.27,and29,whichcontainedadditionalexplanationsaswellasanalternativeproposal.TheexpertfromSpainintroducedinformaldocumentNo.28proposinganotherwordingtothesameproposal.33.  Finally,GRSPadoptedinprincipletheproposalasreproducedinannex2 '"2 tothisreport.GRSPagreedtoconfirmitsadoptionatthenextsession,oncecompletedbytheincorporationofaproposal,tobetransmittedbytheexpertfromSpain,forthemarkingofthenewtypeofsafetybelts.34.  Referringtotheaccelerationtestdevice(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12and  +>&7 TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/2),theexpertfromFranceinformedGRSPthat,afterconductingsomecomparisontests,theresultsshowedthattherewasnoequivalencebetweentheaccelerationandthedecelerationtestdevices.He #-T(: offeredtotransmitthosetestresultsforconsiderationattheDecember2001session.Nevertheless,theexpertfromtheRussianFederationinformedGRSPthathiscountryhadalsoconductedtests,andcontrarytotheFrenchfindings,theequivalencebetweenthetwodeviceswasconsideredacceptable.35.  TheexpertfromFrancestatedthat,inthecasethatanalternativetest Iz devicewouldbeaccepted,theRegulationshouldalwaysgiveapossibilitytothetechnicalservicestocarryoutthetestwiththedecelerationtestdevice.Heinsistedthatthecurrenttestmethodshouldbeconsideredastheconventionaltestdeviceprocedure.Healsostatedthat,inordertoguaranteetheconformityofproductioncontrols,itshouldberequestedthatthetypeofdynamictesttobeusedshouldbeexclusivelyusedforthetypeapprovaloftherelevantsafetybelt,andthatfortheapprovalsgrantedwiththedecelerationtestdevice,theconformityofproductionshouldalsobecarriedoutwiththedecelerationtestdevice.36.  TheexpertfromJapanwithdrawhisproposalfortherecognitionofthe   JapaneseandUnitedStatesofAmericastandardsasequivalenttoRegulationNo.16(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12,annex1B,item11,footnote4/). S  37.  TheexpertfromSpainintroducedinformaldocumentNo.17,which   containedaproposalforadraftCorrigendumtoRegulationNo.16.GRSPagreedtoconsideritatthenextsessionandrequestedthesecretariattodistributeitwithanofficialsymbol.38.  TheexpertfromGermanyintroducedinformaldocumentsNos.9and10for 1b amendingRegulationNo.16.Inordertoallowadetailedconsiderationoftheproposals,GRSPrequestedthesecretariattoconsolidatebothinformaldocumentsanddistributethemwithanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.(d)  RegulationNo.17(Strengthofseats) ] Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/6/Rev.1;informaldocumentsNos.20and ! 24ofannex1tothisreport.39.  TheexpertfromSpainexplainedtoGRSPthattheworkstillcontinuedon $ updatingtheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/6/Rev.1.HeenvisageditspresentationattheDecember2001session.40.  TheexpertfromtheCzechRepublicpresentedinformaldocumentNo.24  ( containingaproposaltoamendthescopeoftheRegulation,tocorrectsomeerrorsinthedrawings,toharmonizeitwiththecorrespondingEuropeanCommunityDirective,andtoallowtheapprovalofaseatasacomponent.41.  GRSPagreedtocontinueitsconsiderationoftheproposalatthenext $J- session,andrequestedthesecretariattodistributeinformaldocumentNo.24withanofficialsymbol.42.  TheexpertfromCLEPAsuggestedtoincludeintothescopeofthe &"1 Regulationthepartitioningsystemsanditsanchorages(informaldocumentNo.20).GRSPgaveitsgeneralsupporttotheprinciple,andtheexpertfromCLEPAagreedtoprepareaconcreteproposal.  [*%6 (e)  RegulationNo.21(Interiorfittings)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1998/17;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/11; 3d TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/11;informaldocumentNo.18ofannex1tothisreport.43.  TheexpertsfromGermanyandSpainintroducedtheresultsoftheworkof Iz theinformalgroup(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/11).TheyalsoexplainedthattheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/11hadbeenincludedinit.TheexpertfromOICAintroducedinformaldocumentNo.18containingminormodificationstotheproposalandsuggestedtoconsideritjointly.44.  GRSPthankedtheinformalgroup'smembersand,inafirstreadingofthe u   proposal,agreedtheamendmentstodocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/11reproducedbelow:Paragraph2.17.,amendtheword"gravity"toread"severity" =n  Paragraph5.1.6.,amendtoread:   0  0 ##".......hardnesswillnotbecutsoastocontactthesupportduringthespecifiedimpacttest.Inthatcasetheradiusrequirementsshallnotapply(seeannex10,........"  # # Paragraphs5.1.7.1.and5.1.7.2.,amendtheword"avoid"toread"prevent",  andtheword"contractible"toread"_contactable_"Paragraph5.2.3.2.,correctthereferencetoparagraph"5.2.3."to"5.2.3.2."  Paragraph5.2.4,amendtoread: Gx 0  0 ##"........hardnesswillnotbecutsoastocontactthesupportduringthespecifiedimpacttest.Inthatcasetheradiusrequirementsshallnotapply."  # # Paragraph5.3.5,amendtoread: s" 0  0 ##"........hardnesswillnotbecutsoastocontactthesupportduringthespecifiedimpacttest.Inthatcasetheradiusrequirementsshallnotapply."  # # Paragraph5.9.1,amendtoread:  ( 0  0 ##"........thesoftmaterialoflessthan50Shorehardnesswillnotbecutsoastocontactthesupportduringthespecifiedimpacttest.Inthatcasetheradiusrequirementsshallnotapply."  # # _T0  0 ##03 # #03 #3 #0##0;##0;#;#0##0C##0C#C#0##T_Annex3,deletethereferencetoannex10afterthetitle(thecurrenttextof }% / theRegulationremainsunchanged)Annex8, '"2 Paragraph3.,amendthewords"system,thatthispart"toread"system,then (($4 thispart"Paragraph1.2.3.,amendtoread:  +>&7 0  0 ##".........bevalidatedbyatleastthreeoftheimpact...."  # #  #-T(: Annex9,figure1,secondposition,theword"interior"shouldbeplacedbelow  thewords"Roofframe"Annex10,  Paragraph2.4.,amendtoread: Iz 0  0 ##".......acrossthewidthofthevehicle.Wheretwoor...."  # # Paragraph5.1.4.,amendtoread:  B  0  0 ##".......apparatusofannex6,paragraph2.Themaximum......"  # # 45.  TheexpertfromItalymadeareservationtoannex8,paragraph1.2.1.   concerningtheimpacttestandrequestedabetterdefinitionof95thpercentilemale.TheexpertfromGermanyremindedGRSPthatthistestwasoneofthepossibilitiesforvehicleimpacttest.46.  TheChairmanthankedthecoChairmansandthemembersoftheinformal S  groupfortheexcellentworkmade.GRSPagreedtoresumeconsiderationoftheproposalatitsnextsession.(f)  RegulationNo.29(Cabsofcommercialvehicles) L Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1998/13;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/1;  TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/3;informaldocumentsNos.23and24ofthetwentyeighthsessionandinformaldocumentNo.7ofannex1tothisreport.47.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomintroducedtheproposalforamending Gx theRegulation(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/3)jointlywithinformaldocumentNo.7,whichincorporatedtheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/3intothetextoftheRegulation.HeexplainedtoGRSPthatthemostsignificantmodificationsconcernedthescope(whichshouldapplytoN2vehicleswithagrossvehiclemassexceeding7.0t),thefrontalandrearimpacttests,andtheroofstrengthtest.48.  TheexpertfromtheRussianFederationnoticedthatnoexplanationand $ justificationwereincludedintheproposalandopposedthenewproposedscope.HeremindedGRSPthatthecurrentscopeappliedtoallcommercialvehiclesandinsistedontakingintoaccounthisproposalconcerningthescopeoftheRegulation(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/1).HealsorecalledhispresentationofinformaldocumentNo.24atthetwentyeighthsession,whichcontainedacompleteexplanationofthetestmethodology.TheexpertfromPolandalsorequestedthatthescopeoftheRegulationshouldapplytoallNvehicleswithagrossmassexceeding3.5t.49.  TheexpertfromItalyremindedGRSPofinformaldocumentNo.23ofthe $. lastsessionandalsoofhispositiononthereport,inwhichtheUnitedKingdom'sproposalwasbased.HealsoremindedGRSPthattheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomhadofferedtoGRSPexpertsacopyoftherelevantreport(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,paras.57and58).50.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomclarifiedthathisproposalwould (($4 onlyapplytocommercialvehicleswithagrossmassexceeding7.0t,andthatthecurrenttextoftheRegulationcouldapplytotherestofNvehicles,withagrossmassexceeding3.5t.Heofferedtoreviewhisproposal,andrequestedtheGRSPexpertstosendhimtheircomments.  q,'9 51.  GRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationofthisissueatthenextsession   andrequestedtheexpertstobringtheircopiesofinformaldocumentsNos.23and24ofthetwentyeighthsession,aswellasinformaldocumentNo.7ofthecurrentsession.(g)  RegulationNo.44(Childrestraints) Iz Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/12;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/2;   TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/3;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/15;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/16;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/4;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/8;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/13;informaldocumentsNos.1,8,11,23and26ofannex1tothisreport.52.  TheexpertfromJapanintroduceddocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/4and ' X  informaldocumentsNos.1and8,whichcontainedadetailedexplanationofhisproposal.53.  Severalexpertsexpressedtheirconcernsaboutthecomparabilityofthe   dummywithasleepingchild,theexcursionofthechild,andarguedthatwiththeproposedamendmentstheexcursionlimitsofparagraph8.2.2.wouldbesurpassed.54.  GRSPagreedtoresumetheconsiderationofthisissueatthenext i sessionandrequestedtheexpertstobring,forthatpurpose,theircopiesofinformaldocumentsNos.1and8.55.  Withregardto_TconcernsT__TTthe_Ԁalternativeaccelerationtestdevices 1b (TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/2;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/3,andinformaldocumentNo.13),GRSPagreedtodefertheconsideration,awaitingtheresultsofthecomparisontestbetweenthealternativeaccelerationtestdeviceandthecurrentdecelerationtestdevice(seepara.34above).56.  Concerningthe"ISOFIX"systems,theexpertfromFranceintroduced ] documentNo.23.AsdecidedforRegulationsNos.14and16(seeparas.26and29above),GRSPrequestedthesecretariattodistributeinformaldocumentNo.23withanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.57.  TheexpertfromAustraliaintroducedinformaldocumentNo.11that $ explainedtheAustralian'sposition,favouringthetoptetherasthethirdanchoragepoint,toavoidchildrestraintsystemrotation.58.  TheexpertfromFrancepresentedtheproposalforConformityof  ( Production(COP)procedure(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/13).HeexplainedtoGRSPthattheprincipleoftheproposalfollowedtheCOPprocedureadoptedforRegulationNo.22.59.  Someexpertsexpressedtheirconcernsabouttherepeatabilityand $J- reproducibilityofthetestsandaboutthedifferentapplicationoftheCOPprocedurebyContractingParties.Otherexpertswelcomedtheproposal,thatintheiropinion,couldimprovetheCOPcontrol.60.  GRSPmadeafirstreadingofthedocumentandagreedtodelete '"2 paragraph11.2.1.Finally,itagreedtoresumetheconsiderationoftheproposalatitsDecember2001session.61.  TheexpertfromtheNetherlandstabledinformaldocumentNo.26,in [*%6 whichheproposedamendmentstoRegulationNo.44,incorporatingprescriptionsfortheregistrationofalldynamictests.GRSPagreedtoconsiderthisproposalatthenextsession,aswellastheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/15,whichhadalsobeentransmittedbythesameexpert. #-T(: ThesecretariatwasrequestedtodistributeinformaldocumentNo.26withanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.62.  ReferringtotheproposalstransmittedbytheexpertfromGermanyon  behalfoftheinformalgroupoftechnicalservices(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/16andTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/8)inordertoadapttheRegulationtothetechnicaldevelopment,GRSPagreedtodefertheirconsiderationtotheDecember2001session.(h)  RegulationNo.94(Frontalcollisionprotection)  B  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/5;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/6; u   TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/7;informaldocumentNos.19ofannex1tothisreport.63.  TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalpresentedhisnewproposalfor   thelabellingofwarningabouthazardsfromairbagsfortherearfacingchildrestraintsystem.Hesaidthattheproposal(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/7)supersededhispreviousproposal(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/5).TheexpertfromOICAtabledinformaldocumentNo.19,whichcontainedhisproposalonthesameissue.64.  TheexpertfromOICApointedoutthathisorganizationwasinfavourof i introducingalabelwithbothtextanda_pictogramme_,butinsistedontheconceptthattheinstallationofitinthevehiclesoldinacountrywasnotamatteroftypeapproval,butamattertobesolvedonanationalbasis.HeexplainedtoGRSPthatparagraph6.2.3.ofhisproposalcontainedtheonlypossiblesolutiontothisproblem,proposingthatinanannextotheRegulationthetextofthewarningwastranslatedintoallthelanguagesoftheContractingPartiesofthe1958Agreement.65.  ThesecretariatinformedGRSPthattheinclusionofthetextasproposed  byOICAwasmostprobablynotpossible,andremindedGRSPthattheonlyofficiallanguagesofECEwereEnglish,FrenchandRussian.66.  TheexpertsfromSwedenandtheUnitedKingdomexpressedtheirsupport s" totheproposalbyCI.TheexpertfromCIsuggestedtoincludesomeoftheparagraphsoftheproposalbyOICAintodocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/7.67.  TheChairmanexpressedhishopethatanagreementcouldbereachedat ;l& thenextsession,andGRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationoftheproposal.ThesecretariatwasrequestedtodistributeinformaldocumentNo.19withanofficialsymbolfortheDecember2001session.68.  ConcerningtheproposaltransmittedbytheexpertfromSweden "+ (TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/6),GRSPagreedtoconsideritatthenextsession.(i)RegulationNo.95(Lateralcollisionprotection) $. Documentation:InformaldocumentNo.15ofannex1tothisreport. /&`!0 69.  TheexpertfromEEVCreportedtoGRSPontheEEVCmobiledeformable '"2 barrier(MDB)facespecificationvalidationtestprogramme(informaldocumentNo.15)inlinewithhispromisemadeduringtheprevioussession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,paras.89and90).Hesaidthatthefinalreportwouldbeavailable beforethenextsession. [*%6 70.  Healsosaidthataconcreteproposalshouldbetransmittedfor +&8 considerationattheDecember2001session.GRSPthankedtheexpertfromEEVCandtheresearcherswhohadparticipatedinthevalidationtests. #-T(: ЇOTHERBUSINESS(a)0  Exchangeofinformationonnationalandinternationalrequirementson 3d passivesafety## 71.  Noinformationwaspresented. Iz (b)  Sledtestprocedureforthedummytestinrearimpacts   Documentation:InformaldocumentsNos.2and12ofannex1tothisreport.  B  72.  TheexpertfromtheNetherlandsmadeapresentationofanewtestmethod u   fortheassessmentsofneckinjuriesinrearendcollisions.Hesaidthatseveralmanufacturers,technicalservicesanduniversitieswerecollaboratingintheworkandthatsomebiomechanicaltestshadbeenconductedandasledtestmethodhadbeenproposed.HealsoexplainedtoGRSPwhatthefutureworkwouldbeandthatinJune2001theEEVCadhocgroupwouldbegintoworkinordertoreviewthecurrentresearchknowledgeandtodetermineifitwouldbejustifiedtodevelopatestprocedureevaluatingtheriskofinjuriesinrearimpacts.Finally,heofferedtomakethepresentationtoTinterestedTexpertsTinterestedonitT.73.  TheexpertfromGermanyintroducedinformaldocumentNo.2,which i containedtheproposedamendmentstoRegulationNo.17inordertotakeintoaccountrearimpacts.HealsointroducedinformaldocumentNo.12,whichcontainedthecalculationmethodforthetorqueattheuppermostcervicalvertebralheadjoint.74.  TheexpertfromOICAreportedthatISOhadalsobeenworkinginthis  areaandthatalltheaspectsofinjuriescausedbyrearimpactshadbeenconsidered.75.  TheChairmanthankedtheexpertsfortheirreportsandconsideredit ] usefultodevelopaprogramTmeTtodefineadummyandatestmethodbasedonasled,todeterminethebestspeedforthetests,andtoconsiderthedecelerationcurves.Heconsidereditessentialthattheworkwascoordinated,inordertoavoidduplicationofefforts,andtoobtainonlyasingleproposaltobesubmittedtoGRSP.HesuggestedthatthecoordinationtaskwasassumedbyEEVC.(c)  RegulationNo.22(Protectivehelmets) ' Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/2001/27;TRANS/WP.29/2001/28; Q!) TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/9;informaldocumentNo.4ofannex1tothisreport.76.  GRSPconsidereddocumentsTRANS/WP.29/2001/27andTRANS/WP.29/2001/28, g#, whichweretheproposalsthattheWP.29'ssecretariathadproducedjoiningtheproposalsthathadbeenadoptedattheprevioussession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28,paraT.T105andannex3),andtheproposalsofdocumentsTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/9andinformaldocumentNo.4.  '"2 77.  TheproposalswereadoptedbyGRSPwiththeamendmentsreproducedbelow  andGRSPconfirmedthattheyshouldbeconsideredbyWP.29andAC.1attheirJune2001sessions.DocumentTRANS/WP.29/2001/27,  Paragraphs7.4.1.3.and7.4.2.3.,shouldbedeletedandinsertedindocument , TRANS/WP.29/2001/28.DocumentTRANS/WP.29/2001/28,  B  Paragraph6.7.,shouldbedeleted. u   Insertparagraphs7.4.1.3.and7.4.2.3.,fromdocumentTRANS/WP.29/2001/27.   AGENDAFORTHENEXTSESSION78.  Forthethirtiethsession,tobeheldinGenevafrom3December(14.30h)   to6December(12.30h)20011/2/,GRSPagreedonthefollowingagenda: S  *++ 3 X++X*  1. AmendmentstoECERegulations(1958Agreement)     1.1.0 RegulationNo.11(Doorlatchesanddoorretentioncomponents)3/L # #   1.2.0 RegulationNo.14(Safetybeltanchorages) # #   1.2.1.0 Definitionofeffectiveanchorages # #   1.2.2.0 DraftglobaltechnicalregulationonsafetybeltanchoragesGx # #   1.2.3.0 "ISOFIX" # # 0  1.3.0 ##RegulationNo.16(Safetybelts)@  # #   1.3.1.0 Technicalamendmentss" # #   1.3.2.0 Accelerationdevices$ # #   1.3.1.0 "ISOFIX";l& # # 0  1.4.0 ##RegulationNo.17(Strengthofseats) ( # # ____________1/0  Aspartofthesecretariat'seffortstoreduceexpenditure,allthe g#, officialdocumentsdistributedpriortothesessionbymailwillnotbeavailableintheconferenceroomfordistributiontosessionparticipants.Delegatesarekindlyrequestedtobringtheircopiesofdocumentstothemeeting. ## 2/0  GRSPChairmanannouncedhisintentiontoextendthesessionTbyTatleast '"2 ahalfday,subjecttotheapprovalbyWP.29.Md ## 3/0  SubjecttotheauthorizationbyWP.29todevelopaglobaltechnical )$5 regulation. [*%6## 0  1.5.0 ##RegulationNo.21(Interiorfittings) # # 0  1.6.0 ##RegulationNo.29(Cabsofcommercialvehicles)3d # # 0  1.7.0 ##RegulationNo.44(Childrestraints) # #   1.7.1.0 "ISOFIX", # #   1.7.2.0 Acceleratingdevices_  # #   1.7.3.0 Technicalamendments   # # 0  1.8.0 ##RegulationNo.94(Frontalcollisionprotection)' X  # # 0  1.9.0 ##RegulationNo.95(Lateralcollisionprotection)  # # EMd0  2.0 ##Otherbusiness  # # 0  2.1.0 ##Exchangeofinformationonnationalandinternational S  requirementsonpassivesafety  # #   2.2. Sledtestprocedureforthedummytestinrearimpacts i @mmG___________DE    3      ;    ] _+ ++X++ 3 X +vN  *D  GdfA*Annex1  E1CF W _g o"++XE_T0 w 0 w#w#T_H`_g o" CF W XXH  LISTOFINFORMALDOCUMENTSDISTRIBUTEDWITHOUTASYMBOLDURINGTHESESSIONMH1CF W _g o"`_XH+*5;eddd Xdd Xdd X##,d",Kd",dK",d ",dd"+    K ` c tX,X CF W XXK No.   ____   $ Transmittedby_____________  $ " Agendaitem______   $  Language   _______   $ Title   ________________________________________ 4*  $  ?1?41. =3( j  ?1 ? =Japan  j 2.7.   j E   j Supplementalexplanationdocumentconcerningtheproposedintroductionof_CRS_Ԁwebbingsensor_ELRs_ =3+   @2@=2. =3(q   @2 @ =Germany q  3.2.  q  E  q  ProposalfordraftamendmentstoRegulationNo.17 =3   @3@=3. =3(W !  @3 @ =OICA W " 2.2.  W # E  W $ ProposedCorrigendumtodraftSupplement2tothe05seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.14 =3 '  @4@=4. =3(\ (  @4 @ =Secretariat \ ) 3.3.  \ * E  \ + ProposalfordraftCorrigendumtothe05seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.22 =3 .  @5@=5. =3(c/  @5 @ =Japan c0 2.3.  c1 E  c2 Japan'spositiononTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12proposalforchangeinsafetybeltretractionforce =3"5  @6@=6. =3(h6  @6 @ =Japan h7   Ӏ2.3.b  9 E  h: SupplementarydocumentonJapan'spositiononTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12proposalformoderationonsafetybeltretractionforcestandardinECER16 =3H>  @7@=7. =3(?  @7 @ =UnitedKingdom .A 2.6.  B E  C Consolidatedproposalincludingrevisingdiagrams.RegulationNo.29 =3.E   @8 @=8. =3(tF   @8  @ =Japan tG 2.5.  tH E  tI Japan'spositiononproposedrevisionofTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2001/4childrestraintsystem(_CRS_) =35L  "@9"@=9. =3({M  "@9 "@ =Germany {N 2.3.  {O E  {P  Proposalfordraftamendmentsto {Q RegulationNo.16 >4R  $@10$@>10. >4)a S  $@10 $@ >Germany a T 2.3.  a U E  a V ProposalforadraftamendmenttoRegulationNo.16 >4!X  &@11&@>11. >4)G"Y  &@11 &@ >Australia G"Z 2.7.  G"[ E  G"\ Childsafetyrestraintsandtetherstraps:Australiarealwordcrashperformance >4#_  (@12(@>12. >4)$L`  (@12 (@ >Germany $La 3.2.  $Lb E  $Lc Howtocalculatethe_Nkm_ >4$Ld  *@13*@>13. >4)& e  *@13 *@ >Romania & f 2.2.  & g E  & h Remarksconcerningtheproposalforthemodificationofthedefinitionofeffectiveanchorage >4S'!k  ,@14,@>14. >4)(#l  ,@14 ,@ >UnitedKingdom 9)#n 2.2.  (#o E  (#p UKdiscussionpaperonpossibleamendmentstoRegulation14.Anchoragestrengthrequirementsforcertainvehiclescategories >4y*$t  .@15.@>15. >4)+>&u  .@15 .@ >EEVC +>&v 2.9.  +>&w E  +>&x EEVCMDBfacespecificationvalidationtestprogramme.Progressreport ?5_,&z 0@16.0@?16. ?5*-$({ 0@16. 0@ ?Spain -$(| 2.2.  -$(} E  -$(~ ProposalforacorrigendumtodraftsupplementN.2totheRegulationECER14.05 .d) A* A  A  No.  ___  %   Transmittedby_____________ %  Agendaitem______ %  Language   ________  %    Title  ________________________________________ ?5%  1@17.1@?17. ?5*k 1@17. 1@ ?Spain k 2.4.  k E  k ProposalforacorrigendumtotheRegulationECER16.04 ?5  2@18.2@?18. ?5*Q  2@18. 2@ ?OICA Q  2.5.  Q  E  Q  ProposalfordraftamendmentstoECER21 ?5Q  3@19.3@?19. ?5*  3@19. 3@ ?OICA   2.8.    E    AirbagwarningECERegulation94ÿ  ?57    4@20.4@?6  20. ?5*} ! 4@20. 4@ ?CLEPA } " 2.4.  } # E  } $ ProposaltoamendRegulationnr17 ?5} % 5@21.5@?21. ?5*B & 5@21. 5@ ?France B ' 2.2.  B ( E  B ) Revisedproposalfordraft06seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.14 ?5c + 6@22.6@?22. ?5*( , 6@22. 6@ ?France ( - 2.3.  ( . E  ( / Revisedproposalfordraft06seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.16 ?5I 1 7@23.7@?23. ?5* 2 7@23. 7@ ?France  3 2..   4 E   5 Revisedproposalfordraft04seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.44 ?5/ 7 8@24.8@?24. ?5*u8 8@24. 8@ ?CzechRepublic : 2.4.  u; E  u< CommentsoncontemporarywordingofRegulationNo.1707 ?5> 9@25.9@?25. ?5*[? 9@25. 9@ ?Spain [@ 2.2.  [A E  [B RevisedproposalfordocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10 ?5zD :@26.:@?26. ?5*AE :@26. :@ ?Netherlands AF 2.7.  AG E  AH ProposalforamendingReg.44_CRS_ ?5AI ;@27.;@?27. ?5*J ;@27. ;@ ?Japan K 2.3.  L E  M SupplementmaterialforJapan'sproposaltoamendECER16 ?5'O <@28.<@?28. ?5*mP <@28. <@ ?Spain mQ 2.3.  mR E  mS ComplementaryparagraphstotheJapanproposal ?5 U =@29.=@?29. ?5*SV =@29. =@ ?Japan SW 2.3.  SX E  SY ComplementaryparagraphstoamendECER16 r[ Є  9\ ISO >49]  ?1.?>1. 5+)9^  ?1. ? 5E  9_ SolvingtheproblemofRatingnoisehazardforthehumanear Xa Є  !b ISO >4!c  ?1.?>1. 5+)!d  ?1. ? 5E  !e Developmentofanassessmentmethodforairbagnoiseinmodernvehicles !>g Є  #h ISO #i 2.7.  #j E  #k Childrestraintsystems.ReporttoGRSP #l Є  K$m Netherlands K$n 3.2.  K$o E  K$p Anewtestmethodfortheassessmentofneckinjuriesinrearendcollisions"$jr " "((   %L r  m& s ______________ ',"u   M("v L* L  L     g Uf#  3G=*Annex2 @   PROPOSALFORDRAFT05SERIESOFAMENDMENTSTOREGULATIONNo.16 k ADOPTEDINPRINCIPLEBY_GRSP_ԀATITSTWENTYNINTHSESSION       3 l j  Insertanewparagraph2.28,toread:        "2.28.0  0M ##USUK.,#((6#((O((TensionreducingdeviceI  M #M #   4    0  0M ##Adevicewhichisincorporatedintheretractorandreducesthe#O(O(##(O(#((O((tensionofthestrapupon#O(O(##(O(#((O((Ԁ#O(O(i##(O(#((O((automaticoperation#O(O(##(O( #((O((Ԁwhenthebeltis _  buckledin#O(O(##(O(#((O((.#O(O(9##(O(X#((O((ԀWhenitisunbuckled,uponautomaticoperationtension J  reducingfunctionshallbeswitchedoff." M #M #   #O(O(##(O(#  UK.,US.,V(( u   '`  #((#GUSUK.,  T+ 4 <DL! ` c tX,XT  ((O((    Paragraph#O(O(##(O(<#((O((Ԁ6.2.5.3.4.,amendtoread:      0  0##0M ##"........Iftheretractorispartofanuppertorsorestraint,theretractionforceofthestrapshallbenotlessthan#O(O(##(O(#((O((0.1TT_daN_#O(O(>##(O(]#((O((Ԁand ( notmorethan0.7TT_daN_Ԁwhen#O(O(##(O(#((O((similarly#O(O(##(O(#((O((Ԁmeasured,#O(O(b##(O(#((O((forabeltequipped  withthebelowtensionreducingdevice,theminimumretractingforcemaybereducedto0.05_daN_Ԁonlywhentensionreducingdeviceisoperated.#O(O(##(O(#((O((ԀIfthestrappassesthroughaguide#(O(j#O((#O(O(K#O(O(UK.,US.,USUK.,Ԁ..........whenthese  requirementsareassessed.UK.,US.,KUSUK.,#O(O(#O(O(#(O(#O((ԀUK.,US.,UKUK.,Iftheassemblyincorporatestension i reducingdevicethatuponautomaticoperationreducesthetensionofthestrap,whenthebeltisbuckled,suchatensionreducingdeviceshallbebothoperatedandnotoperatedwhentheserequirementsareassessedbeforeandafterdurabilitytestsaccordingto6.2.5.3.5."#(O(3#O((#O(O(#O(O(UK.,UK.,n1jM #M # g     #O(O(/##(O(#((O((USUK.,Paragraph#O(O(##(O(#((O((Ԁ6.2.5.3.5.,amendtoread:UK.,US.,?#(O(#O((#O(O(#O(O( ! #O(O(|##(O(:#  X6 X(OX6 X XX6      0**6 ##X0O( XOX6)(O(    FRUK.,  #)()(#)()(#()(!#O((L  9**6 ##**N#9O(O()(O(    FRFR,     #)()(:#)()(#()(|#O(( G" #O(O(##(O(#      3 [N#**N#30 "......O((3 [N# [N#3(making45000inall).#(O(#X6 X(Ԁ#( XX6U#Whentensionreducingdeviceis 2# equippedwiththebelt,theabovetestsshallbeconductedonconditionTsTthattensionreducingdeviceisoperatedandUKFR, notoperated.O((Aftertheabovetests,#(O(n#O((Ԁ#(O(#((O((.."FR, UK.,M#O(O( ##(O((#3 l& # #       ((O((  '     9**6 ## [N#9O(O()(O(    FRFR,     #)()(##()(#UKFR, O((Insertnewparagraphs6.2.5.4.to6.