WPC =mq3 Ò5XeYe? dĕw$0_̐.A/(qeXⲘZ8pGHۈ/$#[r\>@X_3ӍNZe$Rӕjye2L,}8c  7Q6[(d]rT(_F %4K耎Wd_)<2_1[+l:j)A],Ta|:{GU]8mKSfEm 2nYw&WMs%5zU=. %rER D+T  0E 0C AMK$ 0U:o@]R{U2 0  0 I 0 0 0 0 0^ #!N^  0L m C D39 0l Bf BUB^ ^ Vn 0Z^ ^ w@4ZnSf^ # 0/^ ^ a P5UF"^ )^ 5"AUc 0  0s" g@ U.  U.xxU.x^ 8^ D^ P^ \U.h.U.U>"0000"RRRRRR DCt B-^ >fafa<6X9`(Courier'    0 .   'dxd Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2eX$ .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    ($     A<< c   eX"UKUS.,  33B.++b >uQ!XB  _c cE(2eX$ .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    22A"HelveticaBoldWPC  9513 ,, !y}vH794?7463 52 51 40403/2/2.1.1- 0-0-0,/,/+?. . .  -  -  - ? ,  ,  ,  +  +? ? +  +  ?*  *  *  )  ?)  ) ?  )  ? )( ( ( ?( ' ?' ' ?' '&??& ??&  &    ?        ??     ?   ???    ?   ?   ?   ?     ? ?    ? ?   ? ?  ?    ?  ?  ?    ?  ?? ?  ? ?   ? ?  ?? ?  ?    ?   ??  ?   ?    ? ? ?     ?  ?? ?   ?   ???  ??  ? ? ?? ?? ??  ????   ???? ? ? ? ? ?  ??  ? ? ? ? ??  ?? ?? ?  ?  ?     ?   ?  ?  ? ? ? ?   ??   ?        ? ?  ??   ???  ? ? ? ? ? ? ?   ? ?? ??  ?? ?  ? ?  ? ??  ? ???  ?? ?  ? ?? ?  ?     ??     ??   ??  ???? ? ? ? x? ?8 ?? ? ?  ?? 8 ??  ? 8 ??  ?    | ??  <?   ? ??   ?  ???  ????  ???  ??|  ?  ???  ??  ??  ?  ?  ???  >?  <?  8?  0?   ???   ????   ???   ???   ?    ?   ??   ???  ? ??  ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?? ? ??? ? ?  ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ? ??? ???? ?  ? ? ?? ?? ??  ? ? ?  ?  ? ? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?  ??? ???????  ? ??? ?  ?8? ?~??<? ?8? ??8?? ?? 0??   ? ?`?? ?@??? ? ???? ? ?? ?? ??  ?  ?0 ??0? &?8 ?8 ??` ?  ?  ?? ?  ???????????? ?  ??????? ??  ? ?!?!8<>?~? |?| |?0 < >  ? ?? ? ? ???? ?? ?? ???????????????????   ?<? < x x     ?? ???0? ???$?$?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ??? ???????????? ???? ??? ??x ??  ?? ?  ?????? ?? ?"? "??  <?  ?  ??   ? ?  ? ? ???  ???  ??? ~ ??? @? ? ?p ?     @         ?  ? ? ? ? ???????@?? ??8??? |??? ???? ?? ?? ??    ?  ?    ?>?|? ? ? ? ??  ?? ? ?? ???????? ?? ? ??? ? ?? ?  ?  ? ? ?? ??p`?  ? ~? ~?~??~?????~????~???|???<??`8???8??0???0 ??  ?? ? ????? ?x ?x ?|? ??|? ? > ?  > ?? ? ? ? ??x ? ?|  ?~? ? ? ??  ??  ?? ? ?  ??? ? ???  ?? ?         ?        ?    ? ??  ???? ? ? ? ?    ?  ?   ??   ??         ??        ?  ?  ? ? ?  ?  ? |?  ? |? ?? ? < ?  >     ?? ??  ?? ??  ?       ??  ? ??? ? ?? ??  ? ? ?  ?      ?   ?? ?  ?  ?  ??  ? p ?   ? ?   ?    ?   ?   ?   ?  ??|? ? ???? ?? ??  ?  ???  ??  ??   ?~  ?| ? p ? ?? ? ?? ? ?  ??  ?   ?         ? ?   ?   ?      ?  ? ???   ???   ?? ?? ?? ?  ?? ?  ?   ?  ?  ?? ?  ?  ?     ?   ?  ?     ? ?   ??  ??  ?  ?   ?      ?    "? ?  " ?   ?  ? ?     ? ??  ?       ?    ?   ?  ?   ?? ?   ?  ?      ??     ?    ?    ??   ?     ?  ?   ?    ?    ??  ?  ??  ??  ?    ? ? ? ??       ? ?  ?  ? ?    ?      ? ? ?        ? ??  ? ?         ? |  >   ?       ? ? ? ???  ?? @?? ?   ??  ?  ? ? ? ?  ? ??       ??? ????    ? ?     ? ?        ?   ?  ?       ??  ? ???  ?    ?  ?   ??       ? ?           ?  ? ~  x  p   ? ? ?  ? ?  ?     ?         ?         ?? ? ? ? ??? ? ?? ? ?   * * `*?* )? ?)??))))))?'?'?'''' & &?  ' ? '  (  ) )? * ?*?+?,-J'%$# # " " !?  ?   q?   ?       ?   ?!33 ?!)( ( ' ?' ' & &?%%?%$$ # ?# ?# ? ? ???   ?  - -? ?- , , ?, , , , + +  +  +  ?+  *?  *!*!* "* #*3)3)?3)3)3)?3)3)3)2(?2(2(2(?2(2(2(2(2(1(?1(1(1(1(1(1(1)1A0A0A?0A?0A0A?0B0B1B1B1v) #UNLOGO.WPG H  eX"UKUS.,  33B.++b >uQ!XB  _ !  t! !EconomicandSocial  Council02A`Helvetica  eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _++?++ + 3 ;CK!++7?33 @  @ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  2  (2eX$ .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB      eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _#*+33***XX++7*    2      :       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  **3**XJ!**XX3    2      :       page  2  (2eX$ .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    H4heading 1heading 1&    5+* *bL6 ##5O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>'  `:Body Text InBody Text Indent 2  ;1**x  bL6 ##;O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>L6Block TextBlock Text      #wK5"$#O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>H4Body TextBody Text  &**6 ##&O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#><$2Body Text 2  ;1**x  bL6 ##;O)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO     FR  US     XXXO)<6X9`("Courier NewTTO>4X` hp x (#>xp*HP LaserJet 4Si,$$,0*.(>c$"Small Circle"0 U d$$$$'dxdP 8Body Text 2Body Text 2  2( ` hp x 2XXXW&\  `*Times New RomanTTW     UK  US     W'2 `*Times New RomanTTW>4X` hp x (#>   dK Kd\  `*Times New RomanTT'   +( ~ eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33 @  @ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  17  Annex13|EB<6X9`(Courierd6X@K@22A"HelveticaBoldh2p}wC22A"HelveticaBold2p}wC22A"HelveticaBold 2p}wC 02A`Helveticad`2PkCP02A`Helveticad 2PkCP/2A`Helveticadl2PkCP/2A`HelveticadV2PkCP02A`Helveticad2PkCP22A"HelveticaBold2p}wC(x$UKUS.,  TRW`6&W`6&6&A46&A4T  33+RB.++b >uQ!XB  ђr';x' B B BBBBBDBBBy\I*  eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  19     :  q       M       Annex2Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5H }'(39B$ .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    ݑ{'x~'TABLE ALevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 F eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27  page  19  Annex2Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5<`c 9Z+.Courier New Regular     ѣ}'{' __ eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _ K eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  16  6K4heading 2     UK       US XXX    eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  17     :  q       M       Annex1&jg$1  N ;1 a  iq!y)";   UK  8. a  iq!y)"8   US     eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _++33 @  @  b      >  u        Q TRANS/WP.29/_GRSP_/28   b      >  u        Q page21 b      >  u        Q Annex2  eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+   :  q       M       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28     :  q       M       page  20     :  q       M       Annex3  eX(UKUS.,NN  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33    B  y        U   TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28      B  y        U   page21    B  y        U   Annex2      ] eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page  15  <6X9`(Courier  eX(UKUS.,PP  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _++33 @  @  b      >  u       TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28   b      >  u       page21 b      >  u       Annex2<6X9`(Courier  GRSPLomonaco ISO OICA IMMASppliersCLEPA EEVCAIRBAGSairbag SEL dBCA ADUairbags ECE GRSG bisISOFIXisofixiFMVSSpictogram MBDJASIC JAMAEUROCAM MDB Ing$Kopernikusgrassesteinerpreloading ADR gtrcenterKNbiomechanical daNparagrapheCausfix E.C.nm n eX'UKUS.,SS  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+33TRANS/WP.29/_GRSP_/28  page22Annex3<6X9`(Courier n eX'UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _*+33TRANS/WP.29/_GRSP_/28  page22Annex3  eX'UKUS.,\  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+ ]O?;z| p  @@@E1 4 (1QU +( +( +( +(<6X9`(Courier $  eX"UKUS.,^  33B.++b >uQ!XB  _f33TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28  page20Annex2<6X9`(Courier<9Z+&Courier Regular          nnnn7Hairlinedxd)Hairline dff*  eX(UKUS.,  33+B.++b >uQ!XB  _+ tO?;z|ZA p  @@@EN2Z=2(=1K5  4_TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28page18Annex2@3TABLE A:TABLE B .x!UKUS.,  TRX6&X3' Letter6&A43'T  33+B.++b >uQ!XB    _R?+33('  L*c* UEAz|" p @ H@E""?$'F dEF ??$'QG dEQG ?! ! UNITED R NATIONS WGCz|2n ` @ H@E?2nJ?2n %  %! ??++7!    UEAz| R p @ H@E RR R    Distr.    GENERAL      TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/28    1A6AA9AMarch2001    π    Original:ENGLISH     ? ECONOMICCOMMISSIONFOREUROPE        INLANDTRANSPORTCOMMITTEEWorldForumforHarmonizationofVehicleRegulations(WP.29)  WorkingPartyonPassiveSafety(GRSP)+@ 6REPORTOFTHEWORKINGPARTYONPASSIVESAFETY [ @>ONITSTWENTYEIGHTHSESSION@=(27November1December2000)B++ + 3 ;CK!??B1.  GRSPhelditstwentyeighthsessionfrom27November(afternoon)to %" 1December(morning)2000underthechairmanshipofMr.C.Lomonaco(Italy).ExpertsfromthefollowingcountriesparticipatedintheworkfollowingRule1(a)oftheRulesofProcedureofWP.29(TRANS/WP.29/690):Austria;Canada;CzechRepublic;Finland;France;Germany;Hungary;Italy;Japan;Netherlands;Norway;People'sRepublicofChina;Poland;RussianFederation;Spain;Sweden;Switzerland;UnitedKingdom;UnitedStatesofAmerica.ArepresentativeoftheEuropeanCommission(EC)participated.Expertsfromthefollowingnon-governmentalorganizationsparticipated:InternationalOrganizationforStandardization(ISO);InternationalTouringAlliance/InternationalAutomobileFederation(AIT/FIA);InternationalOrganizationofMotorVehicleManufacturers(OICA);InternationalMotorcycleManufacturersAssociation(IMMA);EuropeanAssociationofAutomotiveSuppliers(CLEPA);EuropeanEnhancedVehiclesafetyCommittee(EEVC);ConsumersInternational(CI).GE.01 0,9 c* c  c  RN++2.  Thedocumentswithoutasymboldistributedduringthesessionarelisted  inannex1tothisreport.  DRAFTREGULATIONONAIRBAGSDocumentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/4;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/5;   TRANS/WP.29/2000/11;informaldocumentNo.3ofannex1tothisreport.3.  TheexpertfromSwitzerlandinformedGRSPthatacrashtesthadbeen ] @ conductedinordertoverifythestatementofacarmanufacturerthattheoccupantsinvolvedinaccidentsratedthecrashnoisehigherthantheairbagdeploymentnoise.Hesaidthattheresultofatest(informaldocumentNo.3)demonstratedthatthenoiseresultingfromthecollisionwasapproximately30dBbelowthenoisecausedbyairbagdeployment,inboththepeakandthesoundexposurelevel(SEL).4.  Asaconclusionheconfirmedthathiscountrycontinuedtoaskforthe   introductionofalimitoftheairbagdeploymentnoise,asindicatedindocumentsTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/4andTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/5.5.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmericainformedGRSPthatSAEwas  workingonthesameissuebutusinganotherconcept,basedon"auditorydamageunit(ADU)".HesaidthattheresultoftheworkmightbepresentedatthenextGRSPsession.6.  TheexpertfromFrance,whocirculateddocument  TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/11,basedonadocumentdistributedwithoutasymbolatthetwentyseventhsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27,para.7),insistedthatpermanenteardamagecausedbytheairbagdeploymentnoisecouldnotbescientificallydemonstrated.HeremindedGRSPthatairbagswereexcellentinreducingheadandchestinjuries,andexpressedhisconcernsaboutpossibleopinionagainstairbaguse,basedonanondemonstratedpossibilityofeardamage.Healsosaidthatthecriteriausedinbothresearchstudies,inSwitzerlandandintheUnitedStatesofAmericawerenotapplicabletotheairbagnoisedeploymentanditsinfluenceonhumans.Finally,heconcludedthatmoreresearchwasnecessarybeforetakingadecisiononthisissue.7.  TheexpertfromSwitzerlandinformedGRSPthatathirdcasewasknownof "% apersoninvolvedinacrashwhoclaimedtemporaryhearingproblems,andthatthenumberofpeoplewhocomplainedofpermanenthearingproblemscouldrisetoalmost10percentofaccidentvictims.8.  TheexpertfromFrancesaidthatinmorethantwohundredcaseshehad % * analysed,hedidnotfindanycomplaintconcerninghearingproblems.9.  TheexpertfromtheEuropeanUnionpointedoutthatariskfactorbelow E((#- 20percentwastoolowtotakeactions.Healsoinsistedonavoidingthatthevehicle'spassengerscoulddecidenottousetheairbag,bydisconnectingit,ifthenondemonstratedideaofeardamagewouldbespread.  e+H&1 (' ( (  10.  GRSPconsideredthatresearchinthisareashouldcontinue,and  requestedtheexpertsfromFranceandSwitzerlandtojoineffortsonthisissue. g*11.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdominformedGRSPthat,inhiscountry,a SX researchprogrammeconcerningairbagswasinprogress,inordertoimprovetheirperformance.HesaidthatdatasuppliedbytheUnitedKingdomwerepartoftheEuropeandataandaskedforcollaborationfromGovernmentsandnongovernmentalorganizationsontheproject,byprovidingdatafromtheircountries.AMENDMENTSTOECEREGULATIONS(a)  RegulationNo14(Safetybeltanchorages) [`  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/11;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/7;   TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/9;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10;informaldocumentsNos.6and13ofannex1ofthisreport.12.  Concerningthedefinitionofeffectiveanchorage,theexpertfromSpain   introduceddocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10,basedoninformaldocumentNo.9whichhadbeendistributedduringthetwentyseventhsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27,para.25).13.  TheexpertsfromGermany,Italy,theUnitedKingdom,andOICAindicated  theirpreferencestomaintainthecurrentwordingoftheRegulation,butofferedtocollaborateinordertofindabetterdefinition.14.  GRSPrequestedtheexpertfromSpaintoupdatetheproposalfor  considerationduringtheMay2001session.15.  ConcerningtheISOFIXsystem,theexpertfromFrance,whohadbeen kp requestedtoprepareaproposalforafirststepintroducingtwolowanchoragesforbothRegulationNo.14andRegulationNo.44,informedGRSPthatinformaldocumentsNos.6and7containedtheexpectedproposals.Healsosaidthat,asaresultoftheworkdone,RegulationsNos.16and17wouldalsobeaffectedbytheintroductionoftheISOFIXsystemandinformedGRSPthatthecorrespondingproposalswouldbetransmittedforconsiderationatthesessionofMay2001.16.  Concerningthesecondstep,heinformedGRSPthattheworkhadbeen s#x' initiated,andthatheexpectedtopresentanadvanceproposalalsoattheMay2001session.17.  TheexpertfromGermanyconfirmedhissupportofatwostepswork,but &!+ insistedthatathirdsupport(toptetherorsupportleg)shouldonlybeincludedifitwouldbeprovedthatitsintroductionwouldimprovechildsafety.Inordertosupporthisstatement,hegaveapresentationshowingthatthereactionofa_CRS_Ԁwithatoptetherwasessentiallynotmuchdifferentfromthatofa_CRS_Ԁwithouttoptether.HealsosaidthatthemandatoryintroductionofatoptethersupportcouldblockthedevelopmentofRegulationNo.14andthesideandrearimpactprotectionforchildren.HealsoinsistedthatatoptethercouldincreasethemisuseoftheISOFIXchildrestraints. -(4 Ї18.  TheexpertfromCanadaexplainedtoGRSPthatinhiscountrytestshad  beenmadeconcludingthatatoptetherwasthebestsolutiontocontrolthechild'sexcursion.TheexpertsfromAIT/FIAandCIsupportedtheideaofhavingathirdsupport,butsaidthattheycouldacceptatoptetherorasupportleg.19.  TheexpertsfromOICAandCLEPAinsistedonconsidering,asafirst   step,theproposalforthetwolowerISOFIXanchoragepoints.WithrespecttothethirdsupporttheysuggestedtowaituntilISOwouldfinalizetheworksearchingforthebestsolution.$$$20.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomstatedthatitwasdangerousto    introducethetwoloweranchoragesonlyasafirststep.Heregrettedthat,afterhavingpositivetestresultsshowingtheneedforathirdanchorage,GRSPhavechosenanonuniversalsolution.HeexpressedhisconcernsaboutthechildejectionandexpressedhisfearthattheadoptedapproachcouldgivetoISOFIXabadreputation.21.  TheexpertfromISOexplainedtoGRSPthestateoftheworkonthe   ISOFIXsystem.HesaidthatPartIofstandardISO13216,concerningthetwolowanchorageswasfinished,andthattheworkonPartIIcouldbefinishedbytheendof2001.22.  ConcerninginformaldocumentNo.22specifically,theexpertfromEEVC  explainedtoGRSPthatISOFIXshouldguaranteeuniversalityofthe_CRS_,andthatthisconceptwasnotpreserved.23.  AfterafirstconsiderationofinformaldocumentNo.6thefollowing  amendmentsweresuggested:Paragraph2.17.,amendtoread: kp "2.17."ISOFIXlowanchorage"means....   Paragraph2.18.,amendtoread: " "2.18."ISOFIXlowanchoragesystems"means...." ! $ Consideringthisparagraphandatthesuggestionof_C.I._,GRSGagreedontheconceptthatanotheranchoragewasneededtoavoidrotation(toptetherorsupportleg).Paragraph2.19.,shouldberevised. % * Figure2:Theneedtohaveareferencetothemassforthedeviceshouldbe ['`", considered,andtheexpertfromSpainexpressedhisreservationconcerningthetoodefinedconstructionofthedevice.HealsoexpressedthatthemovementoftheXpointcouldexceed2mmifthefoamwassoft.Paragraph5.2.2.1.,theexpertfromCLEPArequestedtointroducethe C+H&1 tolerancesoftheISOstandard.  ,'3 Paragraph5.2.2.2.,theexpertsfromCanada,SpainandEEVCsuggestedthatthe   positionof_CRS_Ԁshouldbeincluded.TheexpertfromOICAsuggestedtoinsertanewparagraph5.2.3.,ascontainedininformaldocumentNo.13.GRSPagreedwiththedraftingreproducedbelow.Insertanewparagraph5.2.3.,toread:   "5.2.3.0 ISOFIXanchoragesystemshallbepermanentlyinpositionor ; @ storable.Incaseofstorableanchorages,therequirementsrelatingtoISOFIXanchoragesshallbefulfilledinthedeployedposition."  $ $ Paragraph5.3.10.,theexpertfromCIrequestedthatISOFIXanchoragesshould #(  onlybeinstalledintherearseatsofvehicles.TheexpertfromSwedenrequestedtohaveISOFIXanchoragesforrearfacechildrestraintsystemsinthefrontpassengerseat.TheexpertfromGermanysuggestedthatmanufacturersshouldhavethefreedomtoinstallISOFIXanchoragesinallthevehicleseats.Paragraph5.3.10.1.1.,theexpertfromSpainofferedtoredraftit.  Paragraph5.3.10.1.2.,theexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomexpressedhis +0 concernsandofferedtoproposeabetterwordingjointlywiththeexpertfromFrance.Paragraph6.6.4.2.,theexpertfromSpainraisedthequestionofthe KP possibilityofapplyinglateralforcessimultaneously,giventheXpointposition.GRSPagreedthatthisissueshouldbeconsideredjointlybytheexpertsfromFranceandSpain.Paragraph6.4.4.4.,amendtoread: 38 0  0 $$"....iftherequiredforceanddisplacementsoftable2aresustainedforthe...."  $ $ Paragraph11.2.,theexpertfromSwedensuggestedtoamendthewordsreading ! $ "ISOFIXchildrestraintsystem"by"childrestraintsystem".TheexpertfromCIrequestedthatitshallbeclearlyindicatedwhereISOFIXanchorageswereinstalled.Healsorequestedthataguidanceforthe_CRS_Ԁinstallationwouldbeavailableatanytimeduringthevehicle'slife.24.  GRSPrequestedtheexpertfromFrancetoprovideanupdatedversionof % * theproposaltobeconsideredattheMay2001session,takingintoconsiderationdifferentsuggestionsmadebytheexperts.25.  Concerningtheproposalforaglobaltechnicalregulation (#. (TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/7andTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/9),GRSPmadeafirstconsiderationoftheproposal.Thefollowingquestionswereraised.26.  Inthescope(paragraph2.2.),itwasagreedtopostponethe  ,'2 considerationofthedefinitionsuntiltheworkwascompletedbytheGRSGinformalgroupon"Commontasks". -(4 g* g  g  AA27.  TheexpertfromOICAexplainedtoGRSPthatparagraph2.3.wasinsquare  bracketstomarkthatRegulationNo.14containedamoreconvenientdefinitionofbeltanchoragesthanFMVSSNo.210.TheexpertfromUSAsaidthatacompletedefinitionwasneededinordertoensuretherequiredextentofthetest.TheexpertfromJapansupportedtheneedforashortdefinition.GRSPdidnottakeanydecisiononthisissueandagreedtocontinueitsconsideration.28.  Forthedefinitionofaneffectiveanchorage(para.2.4.),GRSPagreed ; @ toawaitthedecisionontheproposalconcerningthesamesubject(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/10)forRegulationNo.14.TheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmericastatedhisreservationtothisdecision.29.  Concerningparagraph2.6.1.,theexpertfromSpainraisedthequestion #(  ifthepassengerseatisbehindthedriver's"R"point.TheexpertfromGermanyrequestedclarificationconcerningwhichpartoftheseatistobefolded(para.2.9).Forparagraph2.1.4.itwassuggestedthatthetitleshouldbeamended.30.  Concerningtheminimumnumberofsafetybeltanchoragestobeprovided  (paras.3.2.to3.2.6.),theexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomsuggestedthatalltheseatsshouldhave3safetybeltanchorages,andalsotheISOFIXanchorages.GRSPrequestedtheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmericatoclarifyhispositionatthenextsession.31.  TheexpertsfromtheNetherlandsandCIwereagainstmakingany  referencestoRegulationNo.94,FMVSSNo.208andtoJapanesestandards(paragraph3.3.).32.  Forthelocationoftheeffectivelowerbeltanchorages(para.3.3.2.),  theexpertfromOICAexplainedthattheproposalcontainedtheprescriptionsofRegulationNo.14.TheexpertfromUnitedSatesofAmericawasrequestedtogivehiscommentsatthenextsession.33.  Concerningthetests,theChairmansuggestedtoconsidertheir " prescriptionsatthenextsessionandrequestedtheexpertstostudythempriortothesession.34.  TheexpertfromGermanyproposed,andGRSPagreed,toamendthetitleof "& paragraph5.toread:"INSPECTIONDURINGANDAFTERTHETEST".35.  Concerningtheannexesoftheproposal,theChairmansuggestedto % ) considerthemattheMay2001session,andkindlyrequestedtheexpertsfromcountrieshavingdifferentprescriptionstogivetheiradviceatthatsession.HealsosaidthathewouldrequestinstructionsfromWP.29abouttheinclusionofreferencestootherstandards(ECERegulations,FMVSS,orJapanesestandards)oncetheworkwasmoreadvanced.36.  Itwasnotedthat,inannex3,figure1,somedimensionsweremissing. {*%0 GRSPrequestedtheexpertfromOICAtoprovidethemtothesecretariatinordertoelaborateanaddendumtotheproposalinduetimeforthenextsession.TheexpertfromOICAclarifiedthatinparagraph3.3.3.1.,thereferencetoparagraph5.1.2.shouldbecorrectedtoread"paragraph2.5.of -(4 annex2.",inparagraph3.3.3.7.,thereferencetoparagraph5.4.3.1.,shouldread"paragraph3.3.3.1.",andfinallyinparagraph4.4.ofannex2thereferenceto"29"shouldbecorrectedtoread"(tiltangle,heightdifferencewithaseatmounting,surfacetexture,etc.)."(b)  RegulationNo.16(Safetybelts)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12;informaldocumentsNos.2,5and18 s x ofannex1tothisreport.37.  TheexpertfromItalyintroducedinformaldocumentNo.5whichcontained    aproposaltoalignRegulationNo.16withthecorrespondingEuropeanCommunityDirective2000/3/EC.GRSPadoptedtheproposalasreproducedinannex2tothisreportandagreedtotransmitittoWP.29andAC.1forconsiderationattheirJune2001sessionsasadraftSupplement12tothe04seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.16.38.  Itwasalsoagreedthat,inthedefinitivetextoftheSupplement,the CH  datesofthetransitionalprovisionsshouldbeidenticaltothoseoftheEuropeanCommunityDirective2000/3/EC.39.  TheexpertfromGermanyannouncedaproposaltoamendthenoteatthe ch endofthetable"Minimumrequirementsforsafetybeltsandretractors."40.  TheexpertfromtheRussianFederationintroducedinformal  documentNo.2whichcontainedthenecessaryamendmentstoincludeaccelerationdevicestobeusedduringthedynamictests.Toallowamoredetailedconsiderationoftheproposal,thesecretariatwasrequestedtodistributeinformaldocumentNo.2withanofficialsymbolfortheMay2001session.41.  Nevertheless,GRSPstatedthataccelerationdeviceswouldonlybe 38 acceptedasanalternativeifthecomparisontestbeingconductedbyFranceandJapandemonstratedtheequivalencewiththecurrentdecelerationdevice.42.  TheexpertfromJapanintroducedinformaldocumentNo.18which S X# containedanexplanationtotheconcernsthatsomeexpertshadraisedduringthetwentyseventhsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27,paras.26to30)tohisproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/12.43.  TheexpertfromFinlandexpressedhisconcernsaboutthereductionof ;$@( theretractionforces,andtheexpertfromtheNetherlandswasagainstthevalueindicatedinparagraph6.2.5.3.6.,suggestingavalueof0.1daN.TeexpertfromCLEPAsuggestedthat,beforeadoptingnewvaluesfortheretractionforces,itshouldbeconvenienttoverifyitsimplicationwithchildrestraintsystems.GRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationofthisproposalatitsnextsession.A  {*%0 A(c)  RegulationNo.17(Strengthofseats)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/1;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/6/Rev.1;and  TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/9;informaldocumentNo.9ofannex1tothisreport.44.  TheexpertfromSpainpresentedinformaldocumentNo.9inwhichhe  askedforaninterpretationofparagraph2.1.1.6.ofannex9toRegulationNo.17.45.  GRSPconsideredthetextoftheabovementionedparagraphas    sufficientlyclearinbothEnglishandFrenchlanguages,indicatingthat"seatsbehindwhichthetype1blockscannotbeinstalledareexemptedfromthistest".Itwasalsonotedthatforvehicleswithmorethantworowsofseats,paragraph2.1.1.,indicatedthattheremovaland/orthefoldingoftherearmostrowofseatsshouldbedonefollowingthemanufacturer'sinstructionsinordertotesttheseatrowimmediatelyinfrontofthisrearmostrow.46.  GRSPadoptedtheCorrigendumtotheRegulationsuggestedbyItalyatthe CH  twentyseventhsession(TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27,para.36)andreproducedbelow.ItwasalsoagreedtotransmitittoWP.29andAC.1forconsiderationintheirJune2001session.Annex9,paragraph3.1.,correctthevalueof"50+2/0km/h"toread +0 "50+0/2km/h".47.  TheexpertfromSpaininformedGRSPthatworkcontinuedontheproposal  ofTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/6/Rev.1andthatanupdatedproposalwouldbetransmittedforconsiderationattheMay2001session.(d)  RegulationNo.21(Interiorfittings)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1998/17;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/11;informal 38 documentsNos.1,14,15and22ofannex1tothisreport.48.  TheexpertfromGermanyinformedGRSPaboutthethreemeetingsofthe " informalgroup(Madrid,February2000;Cologne,May2000;andMadrid,September2000).Hesaidthat,asaresultofthework,aproposalforthefirststephadbeenprepared(informaldocumentNo.1).HeexplainedtoGRSPthatanewrevisedproposalshouldbetransmittedontimetobeconsidered,asanofficialproposal,attheMay2001session.49.  TheexpertfromSpainrecalledthattheproposalofinformal % ) documentNo.1wastheresultforafirststepandthatthedynamictestincludedinFMVSSNo.201wouldbeconsideredinthesecondstepoftheamendmentstoRegulationNo.21.HealsosaidthattheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/1999/11shouldbeincorporatedinthefutureproposal.50.  TheexpertfromOICAintroducedinformaldocumentsNos.14and22,which )$/ supersededinformaldocumentNo.15.Thedocumentscontainedproposedamendmentsregardingpoweroperatingwindows,openingroofsandpartitions,andanewprocedurefortestingenergydissipatingmaterials.  ,'3 51.  TheexpertfromEEVCinformedGRSPthatfinaldatafortheheadimpact   wouldbeprovidedbythemiddleof2001,andclarifiedthatbothbeltedandunbeltedpassengerswouldbeconsidered.Healsosaidthatasidepoletesthadbeenalsoconsideredbutthatthefulltestprocedurehadnotbeendeveloped.52.  TheexpertsfromItaly,Netherlands,andFIAexpressedtheirdoubts   abouttheuseofadummytest(annex8),andtheexpertfromNetherlandsexpressedhisseriousreservationtotheeliminationofthetestwiththe_undeployed_Ԁairbag.53.  TheexpertfromOICAexplainedtoGRSPthathisproposalintendedto    testtheperformancewithalltherestraintsystemsengagedandinsistedthat,ifanairbagisprovidedwithadisconnectionswitch,thetestshouldbedonewiththeairbaguninflated.54.  GRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationofthisatitsnextsession {  subjecttotheavailabilityoftheproposal.(e)  RegulationNo.29(Cabsofcommercialvehicles)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1998/13;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/1;informal ch documentsNos.8,23and24ofannex1tothisreport.55.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdompresentedaproposaltoincludeinto  thescopeoftheRegulationvehicleswithamaximumauthorizedmassexceeding7.0tonnes(informaldocumentNo.8).HeexplainedtoGRSPthattheproposalwastheresultofaresearchstudywhichhadconsidered200accidentsinwhichthedriverwaskilled.56.  TheexpertfromtheRussianFederationshoweddata(informal kp documentNo.24)fromhiscountry.HeexpressedconcernsabouttestsforN3categoryvehiclesandsuggestedtomodifythetestprocedure.*X X++X*57.  TheexpertfromItalytabledinformaldocumentNo.23,whichcontained " theremarksoftheItalianexperttothereporttabledbytheUnitedKingdomonwhichtheinformaldocumentNo.8wasbased.Hesaidthat,inaccordancewiththatreport,only4livesperannumcouldbesavediftheprescriptionsofinformaldocumentNo.8wouldbeadopted.HeaskedtheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomtomakeavailablethecompletereportinordertofacilitatetheconsiderationofthesubject.58.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomofferedtocirculatethecostbenefit % * analysisofthereportonly,butofferedthecompletereporttotheexpertswhowouldrequireit.59.  GRSGrequestedthesecretariattodistributeinformaldocumentNo.8 (#. withanofficialsymbolfortheMay2001session.ItwasalsoagreedtocontinueconsiderationofinformaldocumentsNos.23and24atthenextsession,togetherwiththecostbenefitanalysistobeprovidedbytheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdom.DuetolackoftimeGRSPpostponedconsiderationofdocumentsTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1998/13andTRANS/WP.29/1999/1tothenextsession. -(4 60.  TheexpertfromOICAannouncedthataglobaltechnicalregulation(gtr)  concerningcabsofcommercialvehicleswasbeingpreparedbyhisorganization.TheChairmanremindedGRSPthatWP.29wasexpectedtoestablishprioritiesfor_gtrs_ԀandthatsuchaproposalshouldcomplywiththeprioritiestobegivenbyWP.29.(f)  RegulationNo.44(Childrestraints)   Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1997/12;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/2; ; @ TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/3;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/15;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/16;informaldocumentsNos.4,4a,4b,4c,4d,7,19,20and21.61.  ConsiderationofthisitemwasinitiatedwiththeproposalforanISOFIX [`  systemforRegulationNo.44(informaldocumentNo.7),whichhadbeentransmittedbytheexpertfromFrance.62.  Concerningdefinitions,thecommentsweremadeidenticaltothose {  receivedforRegulationNo.14(seepara.23above).63.  TheexpertfromtheNetherlandssuggestedthatthedeviceoffigure1  shouldhaveconsiderablybiggertheinteriorspaceinheight.64.  TheexpertfromSwedensuggestedtoreviseparagraph6.1.3.2.inaway +0 similartoparagraph6.1.3.1.TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalinsistedontheuseoftheuniversalandsemiuniversalcategoryofchildrestraints,notconfusingthetermISOFIXwithuniversal.65.  TheexpertfromEEVCindicatedthat,inhisopinion,thefiguresof  paragraphs6.3.2.1.and6.3.2.2.werereversed.66.  TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalaskedforclarificationofthe kp marking(paragraph6.2.3.2.).67.  ConcerningISOFIXattachmentspecifications(paragraph7.2.6.),the ! expertfromtheUnitedKingdomproposedanalternativedraftinginordertohaveinthetesttrolleythesamelatchingcyclesasinthevehicle.68.  ConcerningthelabelfortheISOFIXChildrestraint !% (paragraph14.2.11.),theexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomsuggestedtoreconsiderpart2ofthenotice,oncetheprescriptionsforRegulationNo.16wereadopted.TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalaskedthattheISOFIXofthefirststep,withonlytwoloweranchorages,shouldbeclearlydistinguishedfromthefutureISOFIXforchildrestraintswhichshouldhaveathirdsupport.69.  ItwasagreedthattheexpertfromFranceshouldrevisetheinserted #((#- figureofannex6,paragraph8.70.  Thevalueof13515Nofparagraph1.3.ofannex21wasalso {*%0 considered.NoagreementwasreachedandGRSPagreedtocontinueitsconsiderationattheMay2001session.  ,'3 71.GRSPrequestedtheexpertfromFrancetoupdatetheproposalwiththe commentsreceived,andtotransmititforconsiderationattheMay2001session.72.  TheexpertfromFinlandpresentedinformaldocumentNo.21containing   concernsoftheCentralOrganizationforTrafficSafetyinhiscountryaboutanewrestraintmodelwithanadjustablebackrest.GRSPagreedthattheexpertfromFinlandwouldprovideGRSPwithmoreinformationattheMay2001session.73.  TheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/16wasconsideredandthe    followingproblemswereraised:theexpertfromCLEPAofferedtotransmitanalternativewordingforparagraph2.28.,theexpertfromCIwasagainstthedeletionofparagraph4.4.,andtheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomintroducedareservationtoparagraph7.1.2.2.TheexpertsfromFranceandtheUnitedKingdomofferedtoprepareatextforconformityofproductionchecks(paragraph11.4.).74.  GRSPagreedtocontinueconsiderationofthependingissuesatthe CH  May2001session.75.  Finally,GRSPadoptedinformaldocumentNo.19asreproducedbelowand  agreedtotransmititasSupplement4to03seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.44toWP.29andAC.1forconsiderationattheirJune2001sessions.Paragraph7.2.1.8.2.1.,amendthevalueof"60"toread"80".  76.  TheexpertfromtheNetherlandsintroduceddocument KP TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/15andinformaldocumentNo.20containingaproposalforincorporatingintothetestthereboundmovementafteranimpact.77.  GRSPagreedinprinciplewiththeideaofconsideringtherebound kp movement,andacceptedtheintentionoftheexpertsfromtheNetherlandsandFrancetoprepareacommonproposalforthenextsession.78.  TheexpertfromJapanintroducedinformaldocumentNo.4.Heexplained " toGRSPthatthedocumentcontainedadditionalproposalstodocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/3concerningprescriptionsfordeceleratingdevices.79.  GRSPthankedtheexpertfromJapanbutreiteratedthatcomparisontests "& shouldbecarriedouttoensurethatdeceleratingtestdeviceswouldbeequivalenttothecurrentacceleratingdevices.GRSPrequestedthesecretariattodistributeinformaldocumentNo.4withanofficialsymbolfortheMay2001session.80.  FollowingthesuggestionbytheexpertfromSweden,GRSPagreedto ['`", postponeconsiderationofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/3(seealsopara.68ofTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/27)tothenextsession.  {*%0 (g)  RegulationNo.94(Frontalcollisionprotection)  Documentation:TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/5;TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/13;informal  documentsNos.12,16and17ofannex1tothisreport.81.  GRSPconsideredtheproposalofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/13  modifiedbyinformaldocumentNo.17,whichcontainedtheamendmentsneededtoadaptRegulationNo.94inparalleltotheEuropeanCommunityDirective1999/98/EC.82.  GRSPadoptedthetextofdocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/13withthe    amendmentsindicatedbelow.Itwasalsoagreedtotransmitit,asadraftSupplement1tothe01seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.94,toWP.29andAC.1forconsiderationatitsJune2001session.Annex10,   Paragraphs1.3.5.2.3.5.and3.3.5.,amendtoread(Frenchonly): CH    "....._latral_,vertical_ou_Ԁ_pivotant_."Paragraph1.3.5.(Englishonly),correctthevalueof"1251mm"toread ch "12501mm".Paragraph2.3.4.,amendtoread(Englishonly):  0  ".....andperpendiculartothedirectionoftheimpactwithatoleranceof3andsuchthatthemidsagittal....." $$ Paragraph3.3.5.,amendtoread(Englishonly):  0  "....shallbeguidedtoexcludesignificantlateral,verticalorrotationalmovement." $$ 83.  TheexpertfromtheEuropeanCommunityinformedGRSPthat,withthe " amendmentstodocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2000/13adopted(seeparagraph81above),theerrorsintroducedintotheEuropeanCommunityDirective1999/98/ECwerecorrected.HeannouncedthathewouldprepareacorrigendatotheDirective(seepara.82).84.  TheexpertfromSwedenpresentedinformaldocumentNo.12,which ;$@( containedtheamendmentstoEuropeanDirective96/79/ECinordertoincorporatetheEEVCproposalforthefrontimpactbarriermounting.HeA,AAofferedAtoelaborateforGRSPAofferedaAAaAparallelproposalforRegulationNo.94.GRSPacceptedtheofferandagreedtoconsidertheproposalattheMay2001session,ifavailable.85.  Concerningthelabelling,theexpertfromOICAtabledinformaldocument )$/ No.16asanalternativeproposaltodocumentTRANS/WP.29/GRSP/1999/5,whichhadbeentransmittedbytheexpertfromConsumersInternational.   ,'2 86.  TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalinsistedthatthelabelwarning  ofthedangerofanairbagforachildinarearfacing_CRS_ԀshouldcontainthesameinformationasthelabellingadoptedforRegulationNo.44. 87.  AmajorityofexpertsexpressedtheiragreementwiththeConsumers   Internationalapproach.Nevertheless,GRSPrequestedtheexpertsfromOICAandConsumersInternationaltotransmittheirdefinitivewrittenproposalstobeconsideredatthenextsession,inordertoresolvethematter.(h)RegulationNo.95(Lateralcollisionprotection)    Documentation:InformaldocumentsNos.10and11tothisreport.    88.  TheexpertfromEEVCbriefedGRSPonthedraftEEVCproposalforrevised #(  designspecificationsforthemobiledeformablebarrier(MDB)usedinthesideimpacttestprocedure(informaldocumentNo.11).89.  Hesaidthatitwasveryimportanttovalidatetherevisedspecification CH  inordertoensurereliability,repeatabilityandproductionconformityofMDBfacesproduced.Healsosaidthatanadditionaladvantagewouldbetoenabletheimproveddynamicperformancecorridorsforthisdesigntobegenerated.90.  Concerningthetimetable,heexpectedthatthevalidationtestsshould +0 befinishedduringthefirsthalfof2001,andthatafinalproposalshouldbetransmittedtoGRSPfortheMay2001session.91.  HeinformedGRSPaboutfinancialdifficultiestoconductthevalidation KP testsandaskedforcontributionsfromEEVCcountries.92.  GRSPthankedtheexpertfromEEVCfortheworkdoneandalsothankedthe  expertfromFrance,whohadchairedtheadhocgroupoftheEEVCworkinggroup13inchargeofdefiningthereviseddesignspecificationofthehoneycombMDB.93.  TheexpertfromGermanypresentedinformaldocumentNo.10explaining " toGRSPthatthecurrentbackplatedefinedinRegulationNo.95influencedtheEuroSID1dummybymeansofareductionoftheloadontheribs.Hesaidthattoavoidthisnegativeinfluence,theedgesofthebackplatehadbeenbentforward,andproposedtoallowtheuseofthismodifiedbackplate.Hesuggestedtoincludeintothereportsuchauthorization.94.  Afterconsideration,GRSPagreedonfindingaquicksolutiontothe % ) problem,andsuggestedtoactintwosteps.Asafirststep,anewdesignoftheplateshouldbeadoptedtoassureabetterforcedistributionoftheforcesonthedummythorax.ThesecondstepshouldbetheinclusionintotheRegulationofanewEuroSID2dummycurrentlybeingdeveloped.95.  TheexpertfromFranceurgedthatasolutionbefoundandsuggested )$/ resumingconsiderationofthisissueattheMay2001session.B   ,'2 BOTHERBUSINESS(a)0  Exchangeofinformationonnationalandinternationalrequirementson  passivesafetySX$$ 96.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmericainformedGRSPaboutAct  H.R.5164oftheCongresswhichrequiredthe_NHTSA_Ԁtodevelopaprogrammetoimprovethesafetyofchildrestraintsystems(_CRS_).Hesaidthattheintentionof_NHTSA_Ԁwastoelaborateamorecomprehensivetest,includingadynamictest,andsideandrearimpacttests.97.  HeinformedGRSPthatthefutureprogrammewouldbedevelopedinseveral    phases.Atfirst,theEuropean_CRS_ԀshouldbeconsideredandalsoanewISOtestprocedure.Thesecondphasewouldreflectthevehicleseatsdesigninordertoproposeanewseat.Finally,theprogrammewouldinclude_antropomorphic_Ԁchilddevicesfor10yearoldchildren.Hesaidthatthetotalprogrammeshouldbefinishedintwoyearstime,butthatduringthefirstyeartheproposalshouldalreadybeelaborated.98.  Heofferedtoelaboratethecorrespondingnewstandardonaharmonized  basisandaskedGRSPexpertsforinformationtofacilitatetheprogramme'selaboration.Healsosaidthatmoredetailscouldbefoundatthe_NHTSA__website_Ԁatthefollowingaddress:"http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov"99.  TheexpertfromGermanyofferedhishelpindevelopingthesideimpact  procedure.TheexpertfromConsumersInternationalalsoofferedtoshareinformationconcerningdynamictests.100.  TheexpertfromItalyinformedGRSPthathiscountryhadincorporated  intoitsnationallawEuropeanCommunityDirective2000/3/CEandthedraftEuropeanCommunityDirectiveonsafetyagainstfrontalandcentralcollision,andframeresistenceformotorcycles.(b)  Sledtestprocedureforthedummytestinrearimpacts ! 101.  TheexpertfromGermanyinformedGRSPthat,aftertheformalconsentof S X# WP.29tostartworkonanewdraftRegulationconcerningwhiplashinjuryavoidanceinrearendaccidents(TRANS/WP.29/735,para.69),workhadcontinuedincollaborationwithISO.HeannouncedthattheresearchgroupwouldtransmitafirstofficialproposaltoGRSPtobeconsideredatitsMay2001session.102.  TheexpertfromEEVCsaidthathisorganizationwasalsoworkinginthis % * areaandaskedforcollaboration.103.  AttherequestoftheexpertfromFrancetheexpertfromGermany #((#- clarifiedthattheresearchgroupworkwasalsotakingintoconsiderationtheEuropeanCommunityprogrammeconcerningrearimpacts.Finally,heaskedforcollaborationfromthoseexpertswhichhadexperienceinthismatter.A   ,'2 A(c)  RegulationNo.22(Protectivehelmets)  Documentation:InformaldocumentsNos.25and26ofannex1tothisreport.  104.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedKingdomintroducedinformaldocumentNo.25   whichcontainedaproposalforaCorrigendumtoRegulationNo.22.Inordertoimprovedraftingofparagraph8.7.,hetabledinformaldocumentNo.26.105.  GRSPwas,inprinciple,infavouroftheproposedcorrigendum,as ; @ reproducedinannex3ofthisreport,butagreedtoconsideritdefinitivelyattheMay2001session.(d)  ElectionsoftheChairmanandViceChairman [`  106.  GRSPwasinformedthatduetotheenteringintoforceoftheTermsof   ReferenceandRulesofProcedureofWP.29(TRANS/WP.29/690)theChairmanand,ifdesired,ViceChairmanshouldbeelectedeverysecondsessionoftheyearalsobythesubsidiarybodiesofWP.29.Thisprocedureshouldbeappliedmandatorilyfortheyear2001,whilstfor2000,thecontinuationunderthecurrentChairmanwasallowed(TRANS/WP.29/735,para.17).107.  GRSPwasalsoinformedonthe_GRRF_'sChairman'ssuggestionthatthe ch ChairmenofthedifferentinformalgroupsshouldbeproposedasViceChairmeniftheywererepresentingtheirGovernments.108.  GRSPagreedtomaintainthecurrentsituation,andtoholdtheelection  ofChairmanandViceChairmanatitsDecember2001session.AGENDAFORTHENEXTSESSION109.  Forthetwentyninthsession,tobeheldinGenevafrom7May(14.30h) kp to11May(12.30h)20011/2/,GRSPagreedonthefollowingagenda: 38   1. DraftRegulationonairbagsdevelopment !   2. AmendmentstoECERegulations(1958Agreement) S X#   2.1.0 RegulationNo.14(Safetybeltanchorages)!% $ $ 0  2.2.0 $$RegulationNo.16(Safetybelts)s#x' $ $ 0  2.3.0 $$RegulationNo.17(Strengthofseats)% ) $ $ ____________1/0  Aspartofthesecretariat'seffortstoreduceexpenditure,allthe ['`", officialdocumentsdistributedpriortothesessionbymailwillnotbeavailableintheconferenceroomfordistributiontosessionparticipants.Delegatesarekindlyrequestedtobringtheircopiesofdocumentstothemeeting. $$ 2/0  GRSPagreedtoconsiderISOFIXitemsafteragendaitemNo.1. ,'2$$ M  ,'3 L* L  L  0  2.4.0 $$RegulationNo.21(Interiorfittings)" $ $ 0  2.5.0 $$RegulationNo.29(Cabsofcommercialvehicles) $ $ 0  2.6.0 $$RegulationNo.44(Childrestraints)B  $ $ 0  2.7.0 $$RegulationNo.94(Frontalcollisionprotection)  $ $ _B    B  3     B_0  2.8.0 $$RegulationNo.95(Lateralcollisionprotection)b @ $ $ EM0  3.0 $$Otherbusiness   $ $ 0  3.1.0 $$Exchangeofinformationonnationalandinternationalrequirements `  onpassivesafety  $ $   3.2. RegulationNo.22(Protectivehelmets)     3.3. Sledtestprocedureforthedummytestinrearimpacts. jH  @ppG___________DE    B  3      ;   vN  *D  GfA*Annex1  [N1CF W _g o"X XNH`_g o" CF W XXH  LISTOFINFORMALDOCUMENTSDISTRIBUTEDWITHOUTASYMBOLDURINGTHESESSIONH1CF W _g o"`_XH+*5;eddd Xdd Xdd X$$,d",Kd",dK",d ",dd"+    K ` c tX,X CF W XXK No.   ____  Y  Transmittedby_____________ Y  " Agendaitem______  Y   Language   _______  Y  Title   ________________________________________ 4* Y   ?1?41. =3(   ?1 ? =Germany   2.4.    E    DraftshorttermmodificationsofECER21InteriorFittings =3h   @2@=2. =3(   @2 @ =RussianFederation w 2.2.    R/E    ProposalforamendmenttoRegulationNo.16,Revision3 =3w   @3@=3. =3( !  @3 @ =Switzerland >4 "  ?1.?>1. 5+) #  ?1. ? 5E   $ Detonationonimpacthearingdamageduetocollisionnoiseandairbags =3 &  @4@=4. =3( '  @4 @ =Japan  ( 2.6.   ) E   * ProposalfordraftamendmenttoRegulationNo.44 =3 ,  @5@=5. =3(.-  @5 @ =Italy .. 2.2.  ./ E  .0 ProposalofsupplementxxtoRegulationNo.16 =32  @6@=6. =3(=3  @6 @ =France =4   Ӏ2.1.H  6 jE  =7 Revisedproposalfordraft06seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.14 =39  @7@=7. =3(L:  @7 @ =France L; 2.6.  L< E  L= Revisedproposalfordraft04seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.44 =3?   @8 @=8. =3([@   @8  @ =UnitedKingdom B 2.5.  [C E  [D DraftUnitedKingdomproposalforamendingRegulationNo.29 =3F  "@9"@=9. =3(-jG  "@9 "@ =Spain -jH 2.3.  -jI E  -jJ DoubtsregardingRegulationNo.17.07,annex9 >4L  $@10$@>10. >4)<yM  $@10 $@ >Germany <yN 2.8.  <yO E  <yP ECERegulationNo.95.Lateralprotectioncollision >4,R  &@11&@>11. >4)K S  &@11 &@ >EEVC K T 2.8.  K U E  K V EEVCproposalforarevisedspecificationfortheMobileDeformableBarrierFaceforuseintheSideImpactTestProcedure >4d"Z  (@12(@>12. >4)#[  (@12 (@ >Sweden #\ 2.7.  #] E  #^ Regulation94(Frontalcollision) >4#_  *@13*@>13. >4)%Y`  *@13 *@ >OICA %Ya 2.1.  %Yb E  %Yc ISOFIXanchorages.Revisedproposalfordraft06seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.14 >4& f  ,@14,@>14. >4)'"g  ,@14 ,@ >OICA '"h 2.4.  '"i E  '"j OICAproposalforamendmentstoECERegulationNo.21regardingpoweroperatingwindows,openingroofsandpartitions >4)4$n  .@15.@>15. >4)S+%o  .@15 .@ >OICA S+%p 2.4.  S+%q E  S+%r ProposedamendmenttoECER21 ?5S+%s 0@16.0@?16. ?5*,&t 0@16. 0@ ?OICA ,&u 2.7.  ,&v E  ,&w ProposalfordraftamendmentstoRegulationNo.94 ?5b-'y 1@17.1@?17. ?5*.(z 1@17. 1@ ?OICA .({ 2.7.  .(| E  .(} ProposalfordraftamendmentstoECER94 .(~ A* A  A  No.  ___     Transmittedby_____________   Agendaitem______   Language   ________      Title  ________________________________________ ?5  2@18.2@?18. ?5*& 2@18. 2@ ?Japan & 2.2.  & E  & SupplementaldocumentforproposedchangesinECER.17SafetyBelts ?5  3@19.3@?19. ?5* 5 3@19. 3@ ?Netherlands  5 2.6.   5 E   5 ProposalforamendingRegulationNo.44  ?5   4@20.4@?.  20. ?5* D 4@20. 4@ ?Netherlands  D 2.6.   D E   D ProposalforamendingRegulationNo.44 ?5 D  5@21.5@?21. ?5*c! 5@21. 5@ ?Finland c" 2.6.  c# E  c$ Babyrestraintswithanadjustablebackrest ?5S & 6@22.6@?22. ?5*r ' 6@22. 6@ ?OICA r ( 2.4.  r ) E  r * ProposedamendmenttoECER21 ?5r + 7@23.7@?23. ?5* , 7@23. 7@ ?Italy  - 2.5.   . E   / ItalianRemarks_Cranfield_ԀImpactCentreLimitedSafetyofheavygoodsvehiclescabsReport(Ref:S050H9,April1999 ?5$3 8@24.8@?24. ?5*C4 8@24. 8@ ?RussianFederation 36 2.5.  C7 E  C8 ECEUNOrulesNo.29tobechanged ?5C9 9@25.9@?25. ?5*R: 9@25. 9@ ?UnitedKingdom B< 3.3.  R= E  R> Draftcorrigendum3tothe05seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.22 ?5B@ :@26.:@?26. ?5*aA :@26. :@ ?UnitedKingdom QC 3.3.  aD E  aE Draftcorrigendum3tothe05seriesofamendmentstoRegulationNo.22"QG  "    IG  H ______________ %bJ   K    v sf  3GX=*XAnnex2 )f  . DRAFTSUPPLEMENT12TOTHE04SERIESOFAMENDMENTS  TOREGULATIONNo.16ADOPTEDBYGRSPATITSTWENTYEIGHTHSESSION I    N        5#T#aParagraph8.1.3.,shouldbedeleted. i    1n  Paragraphs8.1.4.to8.1.13.(former),renumberasparagraphs8.1.3.to8.1.12. 6     9i  X ` c tX,X9Paragraph8.1.7.(former8.1.8),amendthereferencetoparagraph"8.1.9."to   read"8.1.8.". V  Paragraph8.1.10.(former8.1.11.),amendthereferencetoparagraph"8.1.12."   toread"8.1.11.". q Paragraph8.1.11.(former8.1.12),amendthereferencetoparagraph"8.1.11."to 9v read"8.1.10.".  =  #aʱ#@g   Y @