WPC: %<7}0T^:t ӑP2-i%_Grnv 6 lŮYM&ۖ0| 0+c_&*h #>3 e؀/ 0\lS e@($=oG4v WQ(Krg\H;}wycX`l:\ QwHlEWK_D}jJOL*Yʿ_#ieCZ<8d]d2q:@ W^N Vbh(Ԝ H1=F?b#~M͂܊Ս>)kyM;a*wս BĄbԚpnNC.?n!Oo҈#ȷa[ |FOI O6?UF=Lje0qAߠ(?@;2(-:Q~ΩI# UN  %W 0]U>7 u B7 7 BT ^ q N} w@ 4    0 m UB    AI 0 0 D+ 0KHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$HP LaserJet IIIPHPPCL5MS0vL(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($UKUS.,..,,        TRW`6&A4W`6&A46&A46&A4T<( 9Z &Courier Regular 'UKUS.,..,,         UN/SCETDG/16/INF.15page  1    d+ +d{& LDLTDDDDLȊ&3|x   (3$ !UKUS.,..,,        TRW\6&A43'6&A43'T  U\  `*Times New RomanTT% $# I&mage <=8C HKKKK(3$ !UKUS.,..,,        TRW\6&A43'6&A43'T  (3$ !UKUS.,..,,        TRW\6&A43'6&A43'T  'dxd( $ Figure  4  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5      !UKUS.,..,,        TRW\6&A43'6&A43'T  _b# XPpXXXWcXXPpH_iTRW\6&A4W\6&A46&A46&A4T5ϓ  \ #Wc##X}X7#  X}XXX}XX}++8##X}X#Q&XX}#X}XXX}#X}XXX}  OZUK., y(XX}UN/SCETDG/16/INF.14#X}X(y#Q&XX} #X}X&Q##X}XXX}[#X}XXX}Ԉ  E1 d < tL$XE 3COMMITTEEOFEXPERTSONTHETRANSPORTOFDANGEROUSGOODS       d  <         D SubCommitteeofExpertsonthe $ TransportofDangerousGoods  (Geneva,516July1999,agendaitem(6)#X}XXX}#)UK.,OZ.,XX}Wc66   #Wc##X}X#@[ [ 5MISCELLANEOUSDRAFTAMENDMENTSTOTHEMANUAL@__!5OFTESTSODELREGULATIONS@@SS%5ANDCRITERIAONTHETRANSPORTOFDANGEROUSGOODS@s s 5CommentsonST/SG/AC.10/C.3/1999/31@@zz+     @ 5TransmittedbytheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesofAmerica      1.  TheSubCommitteewillrecallthatoverthepastfouryearstheCommitteehasworkedto )d revisethetestprescriptionandthecriteriaforthe6(c)testoftheManualofTestsandCriteria.TheconclusionofthisworkisreflectedindocumentST/SG/AC.10/14.IndoingsospecificcriteriaforclassifyingproductstoDivision1.4andacompatibilitygroupotherthan SandtoDivision1.4Sweredeveloped.Thesearenowreflectedinparagraphs16.6.1.4.5and16.6.1.4.6oftheTestManual(seeST/SG/AC.10/14).2.  TheexpertfromtheUnitedStatesregardsthecriteriafor1.4Sintherevised6(c)testtaken I togetherwiththecriteriathatarealreadyincludedinthe6(a)and6(b)testsascomprehensiveanddoesnotconsidertheretobeaneedforfurtherrefinementofthe1.4Scriteria.OnthisbasistheexpertfromtheUnitedStatescannotsupporttheproposalbytheexpertsfromCanadaandGermanyindocumentST/SG/AC.10/C.3/1999/31.3.  Itisrecognizedthattheremaybesomevariationintheinterpretationofthenote  under  2.1.1.4(d)intheModelRegulationswhichtakesintoaccount hazardouseffectsoftheproductarisingfromaccidentalfunctioning.񀀀Withtherevisionsthathavebeenintroducedinthe6(c)test,theexpertfromtheUnitedStatesbelievesthatthehazardouseffectsreferredtointhenoteto2.1.1.4(d)shouldberegardedasthesameeffectsthatareusedtodefine1.4Sinthe6(c)_test._Ԁ@yy$5______________