WPCJ 2SBW4 Z#|Q  cpi)Courier New (TT)d6X@?BQ@Courier New (TT)Arial (TT)Times New Roman (TT){@Acrobat PDFWriter 3.0ScriptACPD30.WRSSd6X@K,,,,4'$:@6&6&StandardrJet IIISi8J + USUK#XP\  P6QCXP#2J @X8RCourier New (TT)Arial (TT) Roman (TT)"5@^35@ff{$<(,Q=3`&Q2PQ&P)7PC3`XP\  P6QXP|/aC8`46LXa2p NQX2 |GLg2 #|p Courier New (TT)Arial (TT)Times New Roman (TT)Arial (Bold) (TT)) (Bold)Times New Roman (TT) M' 3'6&Standard6&6&StandardACPD30.WRSSd6X8R USUK#&Q2PQ&P#ѲuFNNhhuNNuuNhNFtN捍:]@tuuCzsffz:N_uuõ*NNu:N:AuuuuuuuuuuAAhרN[ШܨNANmuNhuhuhNuuAAuAuuuuN[Auuuuhp/p~NuhuuNNеNNhhQuN[N:Nuuuu/uN@uNu]FFNi:NFHuhМNNNNuhhhhhhhhhhhAAAAuuuuuuuuuuuuuu" +5\" 2Z % @' LgHP LaserJet IIISi3.0ScriptHPLAIISI.WRSd6X@K4#{@+"5@^3CTee$CCer3C37eeeeeeeeee77rrr]zmANxppzxC7C_eAXeXeXCce79e7eeeeCN7eceaXa&ak5CC$AJNP=eeXXXXXXzXzXzXzXC7C7C7C7eeeeeeeeeeXeeeeepceXXXXXzXzXzXcecceeNeJeA=AeNex7xPeeeCPpNpNNC5[eC[aacee7?c;e;AAXXeCCegCXC;tCmmmmrxx0Ntr5aaamCztk_krkzvXzVtcmzzx3CTee$CCer3C37eeeeeeeeee77rrr]zmANxppzxC7C_eAXeXeXCce79e7eeeeCN7eceaXa&akCeXegCpCAAXXCeCNC3Cccee&eJ7arCeNm;;At[5=;?a[zzzzCCCCrpeXXXXXXXXXXX7777eeeeeeemeeeeeec M' 3'3'Standard6&6&StandardHPLAIISI.WRSd6X+ USUK#&Q2PQ&P#2F@@%peq"5@^8>_pp/CCMt8C88ppppppppppCCttt{ć{8p{{{C8CtpCp{p{pC{{86p8{{{{MpC{lpneM8Mt8AC$CCPPAn{pppppȲppppp88888888{{{{{{{{{pp{{{p{{ppppppppp{{{{{{P{C{AA8{pp{8{P{{{ȽMPppNG8ppC{pppppIIpCpC88eepCCpp8eCCtCnmmntxx0Ptt5appmCztk_krkzvXzVtcmzzx8>_pp/CCMt8C88ppppppppppCCttt{ć{8p{{{C8CtpCp{p{pC{{86p8{{{{MpC{lpneM8Mt8peppCƅCȗ88eeGpApC8Cpppp8pCIptCnPnCCCtp8ACIp{Ȑ8888t{ppppppppppp8888{{{{{{{n{{{{{p{"5@^AIn˨7NNZANAANN䞨AƨڜNANNNA?AЏZN}vZAZAKN*NN]]KШAAAAAAAA]NKKAA]ݨZ]NSANUUĂNNAAvvNNAvNNtN猌8]=qC}o}}gesAIn˨7NNZANAANN䞨AƨڜNANNNA?AЏZN}vZAZAv邂NN鰰AAvvSKNݰANANUN]NNNAKNUď騜AAAAЂAAAADocument[8]_:t+tDocument StyleE _R _P+t !fI _b` ` ` Document[4]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _b  . 2EexeBpDocument[6]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _b  Document[5]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _b  Document[2]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _b*    Document[7]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _b  ` ` ` 2w    9Right Par[1]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b8 @  Right Par[2]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b A@` ` `  ` ` ` Document[3]_:t+tDocument Style ! R _P+t !fI _b 0     Right Par[3]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b J` ` ` @  ` ` ` 2  r1Right Par[4]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b S` ` `  @  Right Par[5]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b \` ` `  @hhh hhh Right Par[6]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _be` ` `  hhh@ hhh Right Par[7]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bn` ` `  hhh@  2"+  !;"Right Par[8]:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bw` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp Document[1]_:t+tDocument Style !R _P+t !fI _bF    ׃  Technical[5]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&!"  . Technical[6]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&#$  . 2g%"##$$Technical[2]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b*%&    Technical[3]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b''(   Technical[4]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&)*   Technical[1]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b4+$,     2y(%&&'Technical[7]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&-.  . Technical[8]:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&/0  . heading 1(_:t+theading 1E _ !R _P+t !fI _bM1C2#w PP# #U PP#heading 2(_:t+theading 2E _ !R _P+t !fI _bP3F4#4f PXP#  #U PP#27,()*Y+heading 3(_:t+theading 3E _ !R _P+t !fI _bM5C6#4f PXP# #U PP#heading 4(_:t+theading 4E _ !!R _P+t !fI _bP7F8#4f PXP#  #U PP#heading 5(_:t+theading 5E _ !"R _P+t !fI _bE9;:#] P&P##U PP#heading 6(_:t+theading 6E _ !#R _P+t !fI _bH;><#] P&P##U PP#2/ i,!A-".#.heading 7(_:t+theading 7E _ !$R _P+t !fI _b E=;>#U PP##U PP#heading 8(_:t+theading 8E _ !%R _P+t !fI _b!H?>@#U PP##U PP#heading 9(_:t+theading 9E _ !&R _P+t !fI _b"HA>B#L PP##U PP#Default Para:t+tDefault Paragraph Font'R _P+t !fI _b#;C;D#4f PXP##U PP#28$2/%2/2&2a4'26toc 1x(_:t+ttoc 1BE _ !(R _P+t !fI _b$EF+w"#B+` hp x (#toc 2x(_:t+ttoc 2BE _ !)R _P+t !fI _b%GH w"#B+` hp x (#toc 3x(_:t+ttoc 3BE _ !*R _P+t !fI _b&IJ 3 w"# +` hp x (#toc 4x(_:t+ttoc 4BE _ !+R _P+t !fI _b'KL3 w"# +` hp x (#2@(28)2);*[=+2=toc 5x(_:t+ttoc 5BE _ !,R _P+t !fI _b(MNw"# +` hp x (#toc 6x(_:t+ttoc 6BE _ !-R _P+t !fI _b)OP+w"#+` hp x (#toc 7x(_:t+ttoc 7BE _ !.R _P+t !fI _b*QRtoc 8x(_:t+ttoc 8BE _ !/R _P+t !fI _b+ST+w"#+` hp x (#2I,2I@-2{B.2D/2Ftoc 9x(_:t+ttoc 9BE _ !0R _P+t !fI _b,UV+w"#B+` hp x (#index 1x(_:t+tindex 1BE _ !1R _P+t !fI _b-WX+ w"# +` hp x (#index 2x(_:t+tindex 2BE _ !2R _P+t !fI _b.YZ w"#B+` hp x (#toa heading_:t+ttoa heading_ !3R _P+t !fI _b/[\+w"# +` hp x (#2MO0CI1J22J32Mcaptionx(_:t+tcaptionBE _ !4R _P+t !fI _b0E];^#4f PXP##U PP#_Equation Ca:t+t_Equation Caption !5R _P+t !fI _b1;_;`#4f PXP##U PP#footerx(_:t+tfooterBE _ !6R _P+t !fI _b2ab+;K!# +` hp x (#headerx(_:t+theaderBE _ !7R _P+t !fI _b3cd+;K!# +` hp x (#2R4MO5nP6:Q7"RAnnex_Title_:t+tAnnex_Title_ !8R _P+t !fI _b4efE & hp x  Bibliogrphy_:t+tBibliography !9R _P+t !fI _b5gh Tech Init(_:t+tInitialise Technical StyleR _P+t !fI _b6ij 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P74k$l     2NU8S9S:5T;Ta2Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P8*mn    a3Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P9'op   a4Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P:&qr   a5Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P;&st  . 2[<U=V>V?Wa6Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P<&uv  . a7Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P=&wx  . a8Technical _b+tTechnical Document Style BE _ !;R _P>&yz  . Pleading(_:t+tHeader for numbered pleading paper+t !fI _b?{|    X  y*dddyy*dddy HHH1 HHH2 HHH3 HHH4 HHH5 HHH6 HHH7 HHH8 HHH9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28   Ӌ2^@D[A;\B\C]Doc Init(_:t+tInitialise Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b@}~    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)Documenta1DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PAF   ׃  a2DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PB*   a3DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PC0    2_DqO^Ee^Fe%_Gp_a4DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PD  . a5DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PE  a6DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PF  a7DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PG` ` ` 2cHp,`I`J6bKba8DocumentI _b+tDocument Styledm BE _ !ER _PH` ` ` Ref_Text(_:t+tdm BE _ !FR _P+t !fI _bI8 &p  N #U PP#enumlev1(_:t+tdm BE _ !HR _P+t !fI _bJ) annotation r:t+tannotation reference!IR _P+t !fI _bK;;#xD PP##U PP#2lL2cM2eN2%hO2Wjannotation t:t+tannotation text !KR _P+t !fI _bLE & hp x ` hp x (#index 7x(_:t+tindex 7BE _ !LR _P+t !fI _bME & hp x ` hp x (#index 6x(_:t+tindex 6BE _ !MR _P+t !fI _bNEK & hp x ` hp x (#index 5x(_:t+tindex 5BE _ !NR _P+t !fI _bOE & hp x ` hp x (#2tP2lQ2nRqS2qindex 4x(_:t+tindex 4BE _ !OR _P+t !fI _bPE & hp x ` hp x (#index 3x(_:t+tindex 3BE _ !PR _P+t !fI _bQE & hp x ` hp x (#line number_:t+tline number_ !QR _P+t !fI _bR;;#4f PXP##U PP#index headin:t+tindex heading !RR _P+t !fI _bSE & hp x ` hp x (#2 |TQtU%uV2wW2yfootnote ref:t+tfootnote reference !SR _P+t !fI _bT>>#rq PP##U PP#footnote tex:t+tfootnote text !UR _P+t !fI _bUE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#Normal Inden:t+tNormal Indent !VR _P+t !fI _bVE & hp x ` hp x (#endnote text:t+tendnote text !WR _P+t !fI _bWE & hp x ` hp x (#2iX;|Y~Z[27Table_Legend:t+tTable_Legend !XR _P+t !fI _bXE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#Table_Title_:t+tTable_Title_ !YR _P+t !fI _bYMC#L PP# #U PP#Table_Text_:t+tTable_Text _ !ZR _P+t !fI _bZE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#enumlev2(_:t+tenumlev2E _ ![R _P+t !fI _b[E & hp x ` hp x (#2k\2]͆^2_enumlev3(_:t+tenumlev3E _ !\R _P+t !fI _b\E & hp x ` hp x (#Table_#x(_:t+tTable_#BE _ !]R _P+t !fI _b]J@#L PP##U PP#Figurex(_:t+tFigureBE _ !^R _P+t !fI _b^E & hp x ` hp x (#Figure_Legen:t+tFigure_Legend !_R _P+t !fI _b_E & hp x #xD PP##U PP#` hp x (#2`abgc2Figure_#(_:t+tFigure_#E _ !`R _P+t !fI _b`J@#L PP##U PP#Figure_Title:t+tFigure_Title !aR _P+t !fI _baMC#L PP# #U PP#Annex_#x(_:t+tAnnex_#BE _ !bR _P+t !fI _bbE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#Annex_Ref(_:t+tAnnex_RefE _ !cR _P+t !fI _bcE & hp x ` hp x (#2ŚdKe2˕f8g5Appendix_#_:t+tAppendix_# _ !dR _P+t !fI _bdE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#Appendix_Ref:t+tAppendix_Ref !eR _P+t !fI _beE & hp x ` hp x (#Appendix_Tit:t+tAppendix_Title !fR _P+t !fI _bfE & hp x  ` hp x (#Ref_Title(_:t+tRef_TitleE _ !gR _P+t !fI _bg! 2Mh<iB3jukHlistitem(_:t+tlistitemE _ !hR _P+t !fI _bhE & hp x ` hp x (#Rec #x(_:t+tRec #BE _ !iR _P+t !fI _biE & hp x  ` hp x (#Rec Title(_:t+tRec TitleE _ !jR _P+t !fI _bj!E & hp x #L PP# #U PP#` hp x (#Normal after:t+tNormal after title !kR _P+t !fI _bkE` hp x ` hp x (#2]l8mBn2o2+callx(_:t+tcall BE _ !lR _P+t !fI _blE & hp x ` hp x (#def title(_:t+tdef titleE _ !mR _P+t !fI _bmE` hp x  ` hp x (#def texte(_:t+tdef texteE _ !nR _P+t !fI _bnE & hp x ` hp x (#Equation(_:t+tEquationE _ !oR _P+t !fI _boE x` hp x (#2pqrs!ASN.1x(_:t+tASN.1BE _ !pR _P+t !fI _bpa9  t% x #L PP# #U PP#` hp x (#ASN.1 ital_:t+tASN.1 ital _ !qR _P+t !fI _bqa9  t% x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#ASN.1 Cont._:t+tASN.1 Cont._ !rR _P+t !fI _bra9  t% x #L PP# #U PP#` hp x (#head_foot(_:t+thead_footE _ !sR _P+t !fI _bsSI#" PP# #U PP#2WtGuǸvQw׻An #x(_:t+tAn # BE _ !tR _P+t !fI _btE & hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#Table_Fin(_:t+tTable_FinE _ !uR _P+t !fI _buASN.1 title_:t+tASN.1 title_ital !vR _P+t !fI _bva9  t% x #U PP##U PP#` hp x (#Figure_Remar:t+tFigure_Remark !wR _P+t !fI _bw` hp x #L PP##U PP#` hp x (#2xcyXzXD{X1!xx(_:t+tdm BE _ !xR _P+t !fI _bxR  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#StickyNote_:t+tdm BE _ !{R _P+t !fI _by4 <DL!(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#Bulleted Lis:t+tdm BE _ !|R _P+t !fI _bz` hp x (##4f PXP#p` hp x (##U PP#Numbered Lis:t+tdm BE _ !}R _P+t !fI _b{` hp x (##4f PXP#p` hp x (##U PP#2|X&}X~~XX.Hanging inde:t+tdm BE _ !~R _P+t !fI _b|R  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#1/2 inch ove:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b}  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#1 inch over_:t+tdm BE _ !̀R _P+t !fI _b~ U] e"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#Indented(_:t+tdm BE _ !́R _P+t !fI _bR  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#2cpq(ee2!x(_:t+tDocument Style !͂R _P+t !fI _b` ` ` 3!x(_:t+tDocument Style !̓R _P+t !fI _b  . 4!x(_:t+tDocument Style !̈́R _P+t !fI _b  5!x(_:t+tDocument Style !ͅR _P+t !fI _b  2p(*6!x(_:t+tDocument Style !͆R _P+t !fI _b*   7!x(_:t+tDocument Style !͇R _P+t !fI _b` ` ` 8!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b8  @  9!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bA  @` ` `  ` ` ` 2010!x(_:t+tDocument Style !͊R _P+t !fI _b0      11!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bJ` ` ` @  ` ` ` 12!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bS` ` `  @  13!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _b\` ` `  @hhh hhh 2L14!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _be` ` `  hhh@ hhh 15!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bn` ` `  hhh@  16!x(_:t+tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_P+t !fI _bw` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 17!x(_:t+tDocument Style !͑R _P+t !fI _bF   ׃  2D 18!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&  . 19!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&   . 20!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b*!"    21!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b'#$   2v ?22!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&%&   23!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b4'$(     24!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&)*  . 25!x(_:t+tTechnical Document StyleR _P+t !fI _b&+,  . 2ZZ<26!x(_:t+tDefault Paragraph Font͚R _P+t !fI _bO-O.#4f PXP##4f PXP#27!x(_:t+tannotation reference!͜R _P+t !fI _bO/O0#4f PXP##4f PXP#28!x(_:t+tannotation text !͝R _P+t !fI _b12E & hp x ` hp x (#29!x(_:t+tindex heading !͞R _P+t !fI _b34E & hp x ` hp x (#2xZl30!x(_:t+tfootnote reference !͟R _P+t !fI _bR5R6#4f PXP##4f PXP#31!x(_:t+tfootnote text !͠R _P+t !fI _b-7#8E & hp x #4f PXP##4f PXP#` hp x (#32!x(_:t+tNormal Indent !͡R _P+t !fI _b9:E & hp x ` hp x (#33!x(_:t+tFigure_Legend !͢R _P+t !fI _b2;(<E & hp x #xD PP##4f PXP#` hp x (#2`p z(34!x(_:t+tAppendix_Title !ͤR _P+t !fI _b =>E & hp x  ` hp x (#35!x(_:t+tNormal after title !ͥR _P+t !fI _b?@E` hp x ` hp x (#36!x(_:t+tASN.1 title_ital !ͦR _P+t !fI _b0A&Ba9  t% x #U PP##4f PXP#` hp x (#37!x(_:t+tFigure_Remark !ͧR _P+t !fI _b-C#D` hp x #4f PXP##4f PXP#` hp x (#2dfU1, 2, 3,(_:t+tdm BE _ !ͨR _P+t !fI _b EF Note de fin_:t+tNote de fin_ !ͩR _P+t !fI _b*G H??USStandard2(_:t+tdm BE _ !ͪR _P+t !fI _b'IJ#U PP#tableofconte:t+tdm BE _ !ͬR _P+t !fI _bK L@rL T\ d @rL T\ d  #4f PXP# 2;shBullet List_:t+tIndented Bullet List!ͭR _P+t !fI _bMN` ` ` x(_:t+tdm BE _ !ͮR _P+t !fI _bOP titlex(_:t+tUniversal 14 point !ͯR _P+t !fI _b*Q*R#4f PXP# #4f PXP# Textx(_:t+tTimes New Roman !ͱR _P+t !fI _b'S'T#4f PXP##4f PXP#2mnqAlineanummer:t+tRecht-Lijnende Alinea-nummers _P+t !fI _b<UV@    Bibliografie:t+tBibliografie !ʹR _P+t !fI _bWXXXX SubKopx(_:t+tSubkopBE _ !͵R _P+t !fI _b.YZ  Volgblad(_:t+tKoptekst voor een genummerd volgblad+t !fI _b[\   UK XX  y*dddyy*dddy HHH1 HHH2 HHH3 HHH4 HHH5 HHH6 HHH7 HHH8 HHH9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28   ӡ2. ~P}- NUMMERx(_:t+tAutomatische nummering van de alinea's !fI _b%]^ uuu BLOKJEx(_:t+tAlinea's beginnen met een blokjeP+t !fI _b籉_` yooooyuuu STAP5x(_:t+tPunten aangegeven met: R _P+t !fI _b$ab BOEKx(_:t+tStandaard instellingen voor boekP+t !fI _b糩cd 6&  X    1 .1 1 *  < 2K``  P BSTAP4x(_:t+tZonder nummering en vetR _P+t !fI _bef KOPTEKST(_:t+tKoptekst even/oneven, titel,hoofdstukt !fI _b8gh#U PP#  #U PP#Titel boek  ӉUK#U PP#`,",Hoofdstuk  #U PP#  ӧSTAP3x(_:t+tNummering van opeenvolgende stappen+t !fI _bri(j#cn PP#bbb#w PP# #w PP#HOOFDSTUK(_:t+tRechter bladzijde hoofdstuk opmaak+t !fI _brk?l ` " #9 P~P#؃ ` " ׃   #9 P~P#2}SX]PARAGRAAF(_:t+tNummering hfdstk.prgrf paragraaf opmaak!fI _bLm2n #cn PP#  #cn PP#KADERA5x(_:t+tKader omlijning ter grootte van A5 14,85 x 21 cm _b繭opUKyh&h&yکKADER1Cx(_:t+tKader omlijning op 1 cm van de rand van ieder A4 _b纭qrUKy#3#3yکSub-kopje(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b,s-t#4f PXP# #4f PXP#2 @0FKopjex(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b缷uv#cn PP#y bdddy  H  x y $.dddy  H #cn PP#Formaatx(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b罫wx   XX EUK  yXdddy  0 y$dddy E   y4dddy  , ypdddy  0 y$dddyں i   #4f PXP#aPage i3ПKolomx(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _byz  {rj$҇Kopx(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _bo{|  a#9 P~P#WordPerfect Europe Nieuwsbrief#4f PXP# tt#4f PXP#Volume I Nummer 12 a Interne Communicatie`x"xOktober 5, 19882!#?#bD+ KOLOM2x(_:t+tTwee krantestijl kolommenR _P+t !fI _b}~"҇PARKOL2x(_:t+tTwee gelijke parallelle kolommenP+t !fI _bB"҇KOLOM3x(_:t+tDrie krantestijl kolommen klein en uitgevuldfI _b "҇ È PARKOL3x(_:t+tDrie parallelle kolommen kleine letter !fI _bC "҇ 2+X&"X~$X&X.)39!x(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b` hp x (##4f PXP#p` hp x (##U PP#40!x(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b` hp x (##4f PXP#p` hp x (##U PP#41!x(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _bR  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#42!x(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b  Z bj"(##4f PXP#p`  N hp x (##U PP#2-x+x0,x,~ -PAR TYP V(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b    PAR TYP VI_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b &   & &  PAR TYP IV_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b &    PAR TYP I(_:t+tGros titre soul gras centreR _P+t !fI _b  2/0~-xN../PAR TYP II_:t+tTitre gras _ !R _P+t !fI _b      PAR TYP III_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b    faxx(_:t+tdm BE _ !R _P+t !fI _b}y#b<y! ddSPTE.WPGb<yh:t+t@@R _P+t !fI _b&    22a001J2a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersC @` A. ` ` (#` a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersL! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersUj` `  @ a. ` (# 2a613345a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers_o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2C<6M78%:Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font11#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#annotation referenceannotation reference11#6\  P6QP##C\  P6QP#annotation textannotation text` hp x (#E & hp x E & hp x ` hp x (#index headingindex heading` hp x (#E & hp x E & hp x ` hp x (#25Du<l5=?vAfootnote referencefootnote reference44#W\  P6QP##C\  P6QP#footnote textfootnote text` hp x (#E & hp x #<\  P6QP##C\  P6QP#E & hp x ` hp x (#Normal IndentNormal Indent` hp x (#E & hp x E & hp x ` hp x (#Figure_LegendFigure_Legend ` hp x (#E & hp x #;2PQP##C\  P6QP#E & hp x ` hp x (#2M$gD4FrHl1KAppendix_TitleAppendix_Title` hp x (#E & hp x  E & hp x ` hp x (#Normal after titleNormal after title` hp x (#E` hp x E` hp x ` hp x (#ASN.1 title_italASN.1 title_ital` hp x (#a9  t% x #I2PQP##C\  P6QP#a9  t% x ` hp x (#Figure_RemarkFigure_Remark` hp x (#` hp x #<\  P6QP##C\  P6QP#` hp x ` hp x (#2:WcMX2PXRXTDocumentR  Z bj"(##XxPXP#p`  N hp x (##d PP#Bulleted List` hp x (##XxPXP#p` hp x (##d PP#Numbered List` hp x (##XxPXP#p` hp x (##d PP#Hanging indentR  Z bj"(##XxPXP#p`  N hp x (##d PP#2]XlWY~Z]1/2 inch over  Z bj"(##XxPXP#p`  N hp x (##d PP#_Equation Caption_Equation Caption11#Xx6X@DQX@##d6X@DQ@#Body TextBody Text` hp x (#sL!#XP\  P6QXP#USUKUKUS#C\  P6QP#sL!` hp x (#page numberpage number1#XP\  P6QXP#2c`]xw^^_Document 8Document 811#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#Document 4Document 4  Document 6Document 611#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#Document 5Document 511#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#2f`Oal bludDocument 2Document 211#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#Document 7Document 711#XP\  P6QXP##C\  P6QP#Right Par 1Right Par 1` hp x (#>.F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>.F NV^ "` hp x (#>Right Par 2Right Par 2` hp x (#>F NV^ "0>#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "0` hp x (#>2oglgl9jllDocument 3Document 311#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#Right Par 3Right Par 3` hp x (#> F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#> F NV^ "` hp x (#>Right Par 4Right Par 4` hp x (#>F 6 NV^ "0>#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F 6 NV^ "0` hp x (#>Right Par 5Right Par 5` hp x (#>F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "` hp x (#>2xlColqltvvRight Par 6Right Par 6` hp x (#>F nNV^ "0>#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F nNV^ "0` hp x (#>Right Par 7Right Par 7` hp x (#>F N>V^ ">#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F N>V^ "` hp x (#>Right Par 8Right Par 8` hp x (#>F NV^ "0>#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "0` hp x (#>Document 1Document 1 ` hp x (#>F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "` hp x (#>2+r/yr{~Z~Technical 5Technical 5` hp x (#>F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@# #C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "` hp x (#>Technical 6Technical 6` hp x (#>F NV^ ">#d6X@DQ@# #C\  P6QP#>F NV^ "` hp x (#>Technical 2Technical 211#d6X@DQ@##C\  P6QP#s5ddd`d6X@DQ@>(,Q=3`&Q2PQ&P)7PC3`XP\  P6QXP|+/aC8`46LXa2p NQX|,7qNA`4vq2p NQ|-u`4p2p NQ|GdT`4m2p NQ2qqt$.. }$e IC2hhBh(.2Z~hVV<e7.wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww whx$$$$2hhhhN2hh2hNhN2hNNN2$222222222$wwwNwwwwwwNq$q2hhhhhhhNNNNhh$hhhhNN222222222222222@]\^@W"5@^.0:]]p!77Ab.7..]]]]]]]]]]..bbb]ppxxpex.Tp]xpxpexpnle...J]7]]T]]0]]&&T&]]]]7T.]TwTQR7+7b.2777CC7]ep]p]p]p]p]xTp]p]p]p]........x]]]]]x]x]x]x]pTp]x]e]pTx]p]p]p]p]xTxTxTp]p]p]]]]]x]x]Ce7e77.eTpT]&]Cx]x]]x7xCpTpTN:.Y]5e]]]]]><]7zz]7&&77]77]]&777t7[[[[bdd(C`b,wQ]]o[Cfy`{YpOyY_YfbJfHr`Ry[tkf}fd}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}.0:]]p!77Ab.7..]]]]]]]]]]..bbb]ppxxpex.Tp]xpxpexpnle...J]7]]T]]0]]&&T&]]]]7T.]TwTQR7+7b}}}&]7]]7p7}}}}&&77:]2T7}}p.5]]]]+]7z>]b7z]C[777`Y.77<]eppppppxpppp....xxbxxxxppe]]]]]]T]]]]....]]]]]]][e]]]]T]s5ddd`d6X@DQ@>(,Q=3`&Q2PQ&P)7PC3`XP\  P6QXP|+/aC8`46LXa2p NQX|,7qNA`4vq2p NQ|-u`4p2p NQ|.GdT`4m2p NQ>/~)J8.` J2PQP?]N;`j]\  P6QP"H^^hv""""2ShhhM2hh2hMhM2hMMH2"222222222 "Y2hhhhhhMMMMh22222h2h2h2h2Mhh222Mh2M2SSShhhMMM2222h2h2222h22h2h22hhMMN2sst",, y""f LC1k"p Qk  1'1V!k[A1v1,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhv""""2ShhhM2hh2hMhM2hMMH2"222222222 "xxxMxxxxxxMs"s"2hhhhhhhMMMMhh"hhhhMM22222222222222"5@^;Obvv³*OOv;O;@vvvvvvvvvv@@l֩L[Ω۩O@OovLgvgvgOsv@Bv@vvvvO[@vsvqgq,q}=OO*LV[]Gvvggggg̛gggggO@O@O@O@vvvvvvvvvvgvvvvvsvggggggggsvssvv[vVvLGLv[v@]vvvΩO][[NO=jvOjqqsvv@JsEvELLggvOOvxOgOEtO猌8[=qqqC}o}}ges;Obvv³*OOv;O;@vvvvvvvvvv@@l֩L[Ω۩O@OovLgvgvgOsv@Bv@vvvvO[@vsvqgq,q}OvgvxOOζLLggOvO[O;Ossvv,vV@qOv[EELj=GEJqj̛OOOOvggggggggggg@@@@vvvvvvvvvvvvvs2^ɕ'"H^^T^GddtTdTTdd&TdTdddTQT tdtTtTad6ddwxa, TTTTTTTTwdaaTTx,txNjTdnnddTT,dd,,T)ddtd)9IwO)9CT^GddtTdTTdd&TdTdddTQT tdtTtT,d)d,TTj,a,dTdTdndwdddTadn,TTTT TTTT@( ,,B? ?  ??????? ~>? ?~????????????????????<??????????? ? ??  ???????ŀ??????????????????????????>???~?????????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ???? ? ??? ?  ? ? ?? ??? ?? ??  ?? ? ? ?? ?  ?? ? ???? ??? ? ?  ?????????<  ?  ??? ? / ?   ?  ? ?  ?   ?     ? ɀ ???? ? ???@ ?? ??  ??? x ??? ?????  ????  ??  ?  ??? ? ? ? ???? ????? ?? ??? ???À????????????????????????????????????????? ? ???  ? ? 8 |? À?? ? ? ????????? ? ? ? ??  ??? ?? ? ??  ??????????????? ? ??? ???? ??? ??<? ??  ?   ??? ? ?   ? ? ? ?  ??? ??? ? ??????????? ???????????? ???? ? ???? ?? ?????????? ??? ?? ???????????????????????  ???? ???? ??  ?  ? ???? ?? ?? ?????????????????????????????????????~?,?????? ? ? ? ??  ?  ?? < ? ~ ?? ? ?  ?  ?  ?? ?? ??? ??? ? ?????????? ??????????? ??? ? ?? ? ? ????? ????? ??? ?????????????? !?>       ?    ? ?? ??? ?????????????????????????? ??  ?? ?? ???????????????????????;??????????0????????????????????????????????????? ?@ ? ?? ?8|?O ?*?0?*0?*?0?*0>?*0<?*0?*0??*?0?? ~??0P?? ??? ?? ? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???  ? ? ???? ? ?? ? ?? ?p    p   ?  ?? ?> ?? ? ?? ? ?? x? ??? ? ?? ?? ???????? ?8?   ?  ?      ?| ? ??? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ???? ??? ???  ? ? ?? ? ??   ????   ????  ????  ???  ? ? dž      ?   ??   ? ?         ?  ?? ? ??  ?? ?? ~? ? <? ?? ???? ? ? ??? ??? ? ?? ? ???  ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ???? ?? ??  ?  ??  ????  ????  ??? ??߀?? ?? ? ? ?  ? ??    ?  ? ? ??  ?  ???????? ǀ ?  ???  x???  x? x? p ?? ???? ?? ??`?????????  ?   ?  ?? ?  ?? ? ?? ??????????????????????8 ??????????? ??  ? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?????????|? 8????x????? ?<~??????????????? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ? ?? <?? ǀ π? ? ? ????? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?  ?  ?  ?  ?? ? ?? ? ??? ? ???  ?????  ???  ??? ??? ???? ???????>????????'????? ????? ?  ????????? ?? ???? ?????????w ? ??? ???? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??x? ??? ??`??????? ??? ??? |?? ??? ?   ? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ???? ? ? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ?? ???  ??   ??  ????????? ?? ? ? x?   ???O  ?? ? ?? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ?? ???????? ???? ??? À? ??? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????  ??  ??  ?  ??? ? ??  ??? ?  ? ? ??  ?  ? ???? ? ? ?? ??? ??? ??  ? ???????????????????????????#????  ???? ?? ?0   ? ?   ?     ? ? ?             ?? ?      ?  ??????  ?  ? O @  ?  ?  ?      ?<??88??!  ???!@! !   ? ?# ?????????????   ?? ?  ????????????? @p+ X4  R j X4 + X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:# f( #2p NQp#E  Q $T?b`_ ff#2p NQm#  yL ?`dddjy    i f Economic and Social  Council  />44  yL /?dddy#J2PQ P# i  ++fECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE  s5 4 ?7+  ++3 Kb #d6X@?BQ@# Distr. GENERAL TRADE/CEFACT/1998/10 18 February 1998  ENGLISH ONLY  s5X 4. ++     COMMITTEE FOR TRADE, INDUSTRY AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT  s5J4Centre for the Facilitation of Procedures and Practices  s54for Administration, Commerce and Transport (CEFACT)  s54  Third session, 1620 March 1998 Item 2 of the provisional agenda  s544  REPORT OF THE CEFACT STEERING GROUP (CSG) CHAIR  s54AzTO THE CEFACT PLENARY  }h* * *   s54@  Submitted by the Chair of the CEFACT Steering Group (CSG)*       J ddx !+ddxl J    P  ++5" This report was prepared in accordance with the requirements for the CEFCAT Steering Group Chair to submit a report to each Plenary, as outlined in TRADE/R.650. The Centre is invited to: review and approve this document.  lPf+ ______________________________________________________________________________ * The present document is reproduced in the form in which it was received by the secretariat. + -,,RR?/@ !Pee?`$hp?`jzPzCe?$e?xXexJԌGE.98+b + Rb "-''/"  `4 b   I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. a. i.(1)(a)(i) 1) a)f+#[\  PjP#Introduction #XN\  PXP#  XU41. bbAs indicated in TRADE/R.650, the Chair of the CEFACT Steering Group (CSG) is required to submit a written report to each session of the Plenary on the Steering Groups activities, and on other relevant issues related to the operation of the mandated working groups. Accordingly, this report covers the work of the CSG since the last session and includes a number of items which require Plenary action or approval. These items are highlighted in the following text.  X 42. bbThe CSG has met two times since the September 1997 session of CEFACT. This report covers all of the key issues discussed during those two meetings. However, more details can be found in document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/8 which covers the December 1997 and TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.2 which covers the January 1997 meeting.  `4 #[\  PjP#Mandates and Migration to New Structures#XN\  PXP#  X43. bbAs foreseen in the previous report to the Plenary, the UN/EDIFACT Working Group (EWG) mandate was submitted by the JRT to the December CSG meeting where it received preliminary approval. The mandate has been published as TRADE/CEFACT/1998/2. If the Plenary approves the EWG mandate, then the final meeting under the UN/EDIFACT Rapporteurs structure and the first meeting of the EWG will take place in April 1998 in Miami. At that point, the migration to the new CEFACT structures will have been completed on schedule and, as a result, there will no longer be a need for GE.1 to meet.  X44. bbHowever, the CSG is concerned that there should be an orderly transition between the JRT and the EWG. Accordingly, it has appointed two of its members as champions to facilitate this process: D. Dobbing and, subject to confirmation, A. de Lijster. Issues that are still outstanding include the final EWG management structure.  X"'+b +b  ++ Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 3, to approve the EWG mandate as contained in  X.#'bb   document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/2.   Xs&' "s&o/**jj#/"  X'  Working Group Activities   X.' Permanent Working Groups  X\45. bbOf the five Permanent Working Groups mandated at the last CEFACT session, three groups have successfully held their inaugural meetings. In November 1997 the International Trade Procedures Working Group (ITPWG) and the Techniques and Methodologies Working Group (TMWG) met with good participation from experts and both groups agreed their initial work plans and terms of reference. The Legal Working Group(LWG) held its first meeting in February 1998 with additional experts from new countries and also agreed its work plan. For information, written reports from these groups can be found in documents TRADE/CEFACT/1998/5, TRADE/CEFACT/1998/6 and TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.10  XB' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 4, to note for information the Working Group reports found in documents TRADE/CEFACT/1998/5,  Xp'TRADE/CEFACT/1998/6, TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.10 #  X46. bbThe Code Working Group (CDWG) is scheduled to hold its inaugural meeting the 1920 March 1998 in Geneva and the Business Analysis Working Group (BAWG) is scheduled to meet for the first time during the Miami JRT/EWG in April 1998. To assist them in the designation of experts to these groups, a number of heads of delegation have sought clarification on the scope of their work. The champions for the CDWG and BAWG have drafted guidance on these issues which can be found in Annex A to this report.  XV47. bbSome heads of delegations have also sought clarification on the options open to them in the designation of experts to Working groups. In mandating the Working groups, the rules adopted by the Plenary for the designation of experts are broad and very flexible. Annex B contains some guidance on the possibilities open to heads of delegation.  X!' Ad hoc Working Groups  X#48. bbThe Ad hoc Group on the UN/LOCODE has now completed its work. Its recommendations can be found in document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/7, which is for approval, and the CSG would like to thank the participants to this group for their efforts and the quality of their contributions.  Xj)' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 4, to approve the Recommendations contained  X*'in document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/7. # "*[0++jj'/"Ԍ X4ԙ  9. bbThe Ad hoc Group on electronic commerce will not submit its final report until the next CEFACT session in September 1998, however, the group has received some very interesting  X.4papers as input. The report from their December 1997 meeting can be#XN\  PXP# found in document  XE4TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.11 and#XN\  PXP# contains a good working definition of electronic commerce.  X' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 4, to note for information the report found in  X'document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.11. #  ` 4 #[\  PjP#CSG Resolutions#XN\  PXP#  X$ 4  X; 4 10. bbAs a management method for communicating decisions, the CSG has adopted the concept of numbered and dated resolutions. Resolutions will be recorded both in the reports for each meeting and the reports from the CSG Chair to the Plenary.  X4 11. bbIn the report of the TMWG to the December 1997 CSG meeting, a request was made to the CSG to give guidance on the subject of business information modelling to the UN/EDIFACT Group (EWG). The CSG considers the implementation of business information modelling to be extremely important for all aspects of CEFACTs work and recognizes its particular relevance to the work being undertaken in UN/EDIFACT. Accordingly, the CSG passed a resolution at its December meeting on this matter the text of which is contained both in the report from the December meeting (TRADE/CEFACT/1998/8) and Annex C.  XO4 12. bbIn response to a concern from heads of delegation regarding the ability of experts to participate in groups electronically, the CSG passed a resolution on this matter which can also be found in Annex C.  X' Plenary action:  under agenda item 4, to note the above CSG resolutions.#  X4   `!4 #[\  P jP#Rapporteurs#XN\  P XP#  XE$4  13. bbDuring the first CEFACT Plenary the idea was raised of using Rapporteurs to promote CEFACTs objectives in countries that are not ECE Member states and to stimulate participation from those countries in all aspects of CEFACTs work programme. Encouraging the participation of such countries and their experts in CEFACTs work programme is important to the Centre both to ensure that its work has global relevance and to accelerate the "(o/**jj%/" implementation of its Recommendations. The most effective way of ensuring this participation is by working closely with the other UN regional commissions combined with the appointment of CEFACT Rapporteurs.  X\4 14. bbThe CEFACT Steering Group (CSG) has been considering in which geographical areas the appointment of a CEFACT Rapporteur would be advantageous. Currently three areas have been identified: Asia, South America and Africa. In South America and Africa further work needs to be undertaken in order to establish the right conditions for a CEFACT Rapporteur, but there is an important opportunity to make an appointment in Asia. Therefore, as a first step in the appointment of CEFACT Rapporteurs for areas outside the ECE, the CSG recommends the establishment of a CEFACT Rapporteur for Asia. Document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/9 details this recommendation and includes a draft mandate.  X+' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 5, to approve document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/9 and appoint a CEFACT Rapporteur for Asia#  XY4   `4 #[\  P jP#Work Programme#XN\  P XP#  X415. bbFollowing the comments made at the last CEFACT Plenary, the CSG has developed a uniform, practical approach to the work programme approved by the Committee for Trade, Industry and Enterprise Development (ECE/TRADE/210). This approach is based on activity planning sheets that break down the approved work programme into high level activities and then indicate the required supporting tasks with descriptions, priorities, dates, resources and status. All permanent mandated groups have been requested to indicate their forward work programme using these activity planning sheets and these have been consolidated into a new document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.3. This document is for information and comment, so that a revised version can be published for the September session. It is the intention of the CSG to ensure that these activity planning sheets are updated and published on a regular basis.  X ' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 6, to note for information document  X!'TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.3. #  X5%' "5%o/**jj"/"  X'Work Programme Strategy  X.416. bbCEFACT heads of delegations have pointed out on a number of occasions the need for the work programme to be related to an overall strategy. In response, the CSG has discussed this issue indepth at its December 1997 and January 1998 meetings. A number of issues have been identified. For example, would it be advantageous to the implementation of trade facilitation recommendations for them to be embedded into guidelines associated with, for example, an existing WTO legal framework or to develop, in conjunction with others, a separate trade facilitation convention?  X 417. bbIt is also important to relate overall strategy to individual programme elements and to express the strategy to a wider audience. In this context, the CSG has discussed the scope of CEFACTs work, its common basis (improving processes) and how this common basis relates to individual programme elements. For example, the approach to removing barriers within an international trade area and within, say, healthcare are very similar. Both require analysis of the process and then a series of steps involving simplification, harmonization and standardization.  X418. bbCommunicating the key benefits of this approach to a wider audience is vital. To that end, the following draft statement was developed, as an introduction to the strategy document, and the CSG would welcome comments on it.  X47bb++fbb #XN\  P XP#Everyone is talking about global commerce, but making it happen is a real challenge. It requires open and effective business and administrative processes which are the goal of CEFACT. Such processes combined with information technology provide substantial benefits to enterprises and governments alike. Some of these benefits are:#b  XV4bb simplified procedures;  Xm4bb integrated supply chains;  X4bb effective trading communities;   X4bb reduced cycle times;  X 4bb streamlined business; and   X!4bb lower costs.#XN\  PXP#"  X#419. bbThe work on developing a strategy is continuing and a CRP (TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.12) will be available at the March 1998 CEFACT session. It is hoped to finalize this document for approval at the September 1998 session.  `j)4#[\  PjP# Promotion #XN\  PXP#"j)o/**jj&8/"Ԍ X4ԙ20. bbThe CSG continues to believe that it is vital for CEFACT to have a proactive promotion and awareness programme. In todays environment it is not sufficient to do good, expert job i.e to be worthy if government and industry are not aware of the work CEFACT is doing, then they will not participate or use the results of that work. Further, as other organizations become interested in trade facilitation and electronic commerce it is important that they be aware of CEFACTs mission and objectives, both to avoid duplication and to optimise cooperation.  X421. bbThe secretariats recent publication of the CEFACT brochure is a step in the right direction and the CSG is strongly encouraging the secretariat to develop the CEFACT WWW site. However, these initiatives now need to be built into an overall programme. The CSG recognizes that, for a number of reasons, the Plenary has not been able to progress this issue, but now believe that this has become a matter of urgency.  XB' Plenary action:  under CEFACT agenda item 7, to review and take action on a promotion and awareness programme#  `4#[\  PjP#Cooperation with other International Organizations#XN\  PXP#  X'WTO  X 4  X!422. bbAt the time this report was prepared, plans were well advanced for a 910 March 1998 WTO seminar on trade facilitation at which CEFACT will have an important role to play. This may lead to a more focussed interest by the WTO in trade facilitation and, increase cooperation between the WTO and CEFACT secretariats. The secretariat will report to the Plenary on the outcome of this seminar in TRADE/CEFACT/1998/CRP.4.  X'  X' 6&6&StandardACPD30.WRSSd6X6&6&StandardACPD30.WRSSd6X8R+   Liaison with Standards Organizations  X!4 23. bbUnder CEFACTs new structures mandated groups have the responsibility for establishing their own external liaisons and a number of group may wish to establish such liaison with formal or informal standards organizations. For example, with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) or Continuous Acquisition and Lifecycle Support (CALS) groups and the Internet Task Force (ITF). However, it is clearly important that such liaisons are coordinated in an effective manner and, for this purpose, that the organizations involved have one contact point within CEFACT. To accomplish this, the CSG")o/**jj&/" have, as reported in document TRADE/CEFACT/1998/8, appointed Mr. KD Naujok as standards liaison coordinator for the CSG.  XE' Plenary action:  to note the appointment of a standards liaison coordinator for the CSG#  X\4   Xs' ISO  X424. bbAt the time of writing, a new draft MoU is under development with the ISO and the IEC for eventual approval by the heads of each organization (in our case the Executive Secretary of the ECE). The UN/ECE would like to extend this MoU to include the ITU and their is general agreement to extend its scope to electronic business. ISO wishes to reflect the recommendations from their High level steering group on CALS and invite participation in the MoU by CALS and NATO/CALS, these being recognized by the ISO as groups with defined standardization requirements. The CSG wishes to ensure open relationships with CALS and other, equivalent industry groups, but it is important that they are all treated in an equal manner. Further, the MoU should reflect a clear distinction between standardization organizations and participating industry groups. Therefore, the CSG is working with the ISO to ensure that these concerns are met.  X425. bbAt the January 1997 meeting of the Joint ISO UN/ECE Syntax Development Group (JSDG), in response to industry concerns on year 2000 compliance (i.e. 4, rather than 2 digits for year representation) and to another technical issue known as segment collision, the JSDG unanimously agreed on solutions to these two issues. In order to include these solutions as part of the current fasttrack process (for version 4 of the syntax), the CSG have authorized, on behalf of CEFACT, the ISO Central Secretariat to include the new solutions in the final draft international standard. It was necessary for the CSG to take this step because of an end of January deadline. The alternative was to wait several years for the next revision of the syntax standard and the CSG judged this not to be in users best interests.  X'   X 'Plenary action:  to note the ongoing work on the MoU and the above mentioned decision regarding version 4 of the Syntax#  X"4   `%4 #[\  PjP#Resources #XN\  PXP#  Xc'426. bbThe last year has been a formative period for CEFACT, but if it is now to fulfill its promise, the work programme needs to be developed and implemented and the permanent mandated groups fully supported by heads of delegation. If this does not happen, then CEFACT will not achieve its objectives and a significant opportunity to improve global commerce will have been lost. The Chair of the CSG is concerned that all heads of delegation"+ G1,,jj(/" actively support working groups by the designation of appropriate experts and strongly encourages them to do so.  XE427. bbAs mentioned in the last report, all groups have been asked to continue with their existing resource levels, subject to a review one year after formal approval of their mandates by the Plenary, i.e. for most groups, September 1998. However, the Chair of the CSG has had discussions with the secretariat to confirm that secretariat resources are being allocated as agreed.  X'  ` 4#[\  PjP#Procedures#XN\  PXP#  X; 4 28. bbOther than the above mentioned decisions on CSG resolutions and the establishment of an R.650 amendment file by the secretariat (as requested during the September 1997 CEFACT meeting) there is nothing to report under this item.  `4 #[\  PjP#Other Matters#XN\  PXP#  X' Single Entry Processing Points (SEPPs)  X4  X1429. bbOne of the consequences of the empowerment of the JRT with its replacement of the UN/EDIFACT Rapporteurs structure, is the possibility for single countries or international organizations to submit Data Maintenance Requests (DMRs) into the UN/EDIFACT process (known as Single Entry Processing Points: SEPPs).  X430. bbWhilst this change has been agreed in principle, before it can be implemented a number of requirements need to be met in the form of changes to the current DMR system. These include: automation of the DMR submissions to the UN (i.e. replacing the current paperbased system), the development of criteria to qualify as a SEPP (including the ability to undertake a preliminary technical assessment of DMRs) and the establishment of a single international technical assessment process. Currently there are four processing points: Alexandria (US), Brussels, Tokyo, and Sydney. Without the above requirements being met, managing input from any additional SEPPs would place an impossible burden on the CEFACT secretariat. This is because the workload, under the current system, increases substantially with the addition of any new processing points. "( G1,,jj%/"  X431. bbIn view of this, and because of its responsibility for ensuring the effective use of UN resources, the CSG has decided that there should be no new entry points for submitting DMRs until the above requirements have been fulfilled.  X\'+b  +b  ++ Plenary action:    to note the above CSG decision.  Xs4   X' Steering Group Attendance  X 432. bbThe majority of CSG members have attended all, or almost all of the meetings. However, two members have been unable to attend any of the meetings and it now appears that another member may have to resign. The CSG has a requirement for a quorum of two thirds (10 members) and depends fundamentally upon the full participation of its members both to ensure a wide spectrum of contributions and to maintain a balance among various interests. Therefore, as indicated in the CSG procedures, the issue of nonattendance by two CSG members for five meetings has been raised by the Chair of the CSG with the relevant nominating Heads of delegation and it may be necessary at the March 1998 session to elect up to three new members to the CEFACT Steering Group. If this is the case, the secretariat will confirm the situation by fax to Heads of Delegation no later than 2 March 1998 and request nominations.  X'+b  +b  ++ Plenary action:    if appropriate, under agenda item 10, to nominate and elect up to three new  X'bb   members to the CSG  +b  +b  ++  X?'  XV'Future meeting dates  X4 33. bbThe following meeting dates for the next 18 months have been agreed.  X 4+b  +b . ++#XN\  PXP#bb 1998. . . . June 15-18, Geneva  X!4bb 1998. . September 16-18, Geneva  X"4bb 1999. . January 25-28, ****Location to be confirmed  X#4bb 1999. . June 2125, Location to be confirmed  X%&4#XN\  PXP# "<' G1,,jj$/"  `4 #XN\  PXP#m#[\  PjP#ANNEX A  jGuidance on the roles of the Business Analysis Working Group (BAWG) and  `4{Codes Working Group (CDWG)#[\  PjP# f+  X6' #XN\  PXP#Business Analysis Working Group (BAWG)#XN\  PXP#  XM4  Xd4#XN\  P XP#The objective of the Business Analysis Working Group (BAWG) is to analyse current business  X{ 4processes and to propose appropriate changes to those business processes.#XN\  P!XP# The role of the BAWG includes the following:  X 'bb To identify business domains; 7bb7 a business domain is defined as an area of business activity such as  X4manufacturing#XN\  P"XP#, healthcare, social administration, etc.#  X3' bbTo identify a domains interfaces with other domains; 7bb7 for example; manufacturing will have an interface with logistics and sales, while  Xa4#XN\  P#XP#healthcare will have an interface with medical insurance and, often, with social administration.#  X'7bb To identify the processes within a domain; #b 7bb7 for example; within manufacturing there is a procurement process, a materials management process, a quality control process, etc. while within healthcare, there is a procurement process, a referral process (e.g. referral from a doctor to a specialist or hospital), etc. Within a process there will be a combination of functions and activities which are supported by procedures and information  X04flows.#XN\  P$XP# #XN\  P%XP##XN\  P&XP##  XG' 7bbTo provide high level domain models to the appropriate empowered group(s), #b  X^ 4bbn #XN\  P'XP#using an agreed technique, t#XN\  P(XP#he domain models will allow identification by the empowered group of the functions, activities and procedures as well as the details of the information parcels, within a process, required to achieve its business goal.#  X$' 7bbTo receive from empowered groups (such as EWG's Joint Message Design Groups) their  X%4detailed models #b 7bb7 and analyse them to determine if the most effective process, procedures and interfaces have been used and match the domain model(s). #  X)4#XN\  P)XP#  X-*'7bb #b"-* G1,,jj'/" 7bbTo recommend simplification and rationalization of the procedures and information  X'flows within a process; #b bb for example, within procurement, the elimination of invoicing.  X\'7bb Where appropriate, suggest standardized or harmonized processes; #b bbn for example, the procurement process in manufacturing and healthcare may be capable of harmonization.#  X'#XN\  P*XP##XN\  P+XP# Codes Working Group (CDWG) The objective of the Code Working Group (CDWG) is to oversee the development, maintenance and use of a coherent set of procedures and underlying processes to govern the production, quality control and publication of CEFACT code sets and code structures. Its role is one of management and coordination in order to secure the quality, relevance and availability of appropriate code sets and code structures. This will cover both UN/EDIFACT Code Directories and UN Recommendations related to codes.  X4The CDWG tasks do not cover the regular maintenance, quality assurance and production of the individual code sets. This activity remains the responsibility of the established Working Groups and maintenance agencies. The CDWG however, will review and develop proposals and recommendations on procedures to improve, streamline and integrate the availability of CEFACT published codes. The CDWG will ensure that the requisite administrative processes and Maintenance Agency functions are consistent and integrated, and minimise any areas of overlap. The CDWG will act as the focal point for all new UN Recommendations related to codes and code structures revisions to existing Recommendations. The CDWG, in conjunction with the UN Secretariat will establish subgroups to act as the maintenance agencies for the relevant UN Recommendations and will monitor the progress of their work. As part of this process, CDWG will evaluate requests for new UN Recommendations related to codes and will make recommendations to the CSG accordingly. The key deliverables of CDWG are:  X%' 7bbProposals on procedures for the effective maintenance and publication of CEFACT code  X%&4sets ;#b 7bb7 This will be achieved by reviewing and evaluating the current maintenance procedures for the UN Recommendations related to codes and for the UN/EDIFACT code sets. Based on this analysis and where appropriate, proposals will prepared for improvements in the maintenance and publication of these code sets.# "+ G1,,jj(/"Ԍ X'ԙ 7bbProposals on procedures for the quality control of CEFACT code sets, including procedures for the periodic review of CEFACT code sets to ensure the relevance and  X.4consistency of these code sets ;#b 7bb7 # 7bb7 This will be accomplished though actions by the CDWG to develop and prepare proposals on procedures that ensure the quality of the CEFACT code sets, including where appropriate the means and instruments to effect close cooperation and coordination across the various maintenance agencies. The CDWG will monitor the relevance of the code sets to the CEFACT community and will develop and prepare proposals to ensure that a high level of consistency and coherency is attained across the numerous code sets.#  X ' 7bbProposals, including draft Recommendations, for new code sets and code structures to  X+'support business processes and procedures. #b 7bb7 The CDWG will evaluate all requests for new code sets and code structures and where appropriate will submit proposals to the CSG for new draft UN Recommendations in accordance with the required business function. Furthermore, subject to the CSGs approval of a new draft Recommendation, the CDWG will assign the maintenance activity to an existing maintenance agency or will establish a new maintenance agency and will advise on the maintenance procedures and quality control aspects.# "G1,,jjv/"  `4 m#[\  P,jP#ANNEX B   `|4qZ Guidance on some of the options open to a CEFACT Head of delegation in  `4 designating experts to empowered groups#XN\  P-XP# f+  X&4 CEFACT has now approved most of the mandates for empowered groups and the mandates encourage Head of Delegations to designate appropriate experts to the groups. Within each mandate, the following wording has been used:  X 47bb Each CEFACT Head of Delegation may designate one or more experts to the mandated group. In doing so, they may delegate this task to one or more organisations which may be national, regional or international. Experts, once designated, are expected to  X4contribute to the work based solely on their expertise. #b  X#4This wording is deliberately broad and flexible #XN\  P.XP#because Head of Delegation will have very different national situations to take into account and, in some cases, there will also be regional or international issues to consider. Because of its broad and flexible nature, a number of delegations have sought clarification on how this designation (and its delegation) should be interpreted. The purpose of this paper is to detail some of the options available to a Head of Delegation who can be from a UN member state, an intergovernmental organization, or a nongovernmental organisation accredited by ECOSOC. The basic rule is that all experts participating in a mandated group need to be designated, directly or indirectly, by a Head of Delegation and, whatever method is used, the Head of Delegation retains accountability for the designation. This means that the Head of Delegation always has the option to personally designate experts from their country or, in the case of an  Xe"4intergovernmental or nongovernmental organisation, from their organization.#XN\  P/XP# Further, the Head of Delegation may change the method they use for designating experts at any time. Options include:  X'' "'G1,,jj`%/"  X'1) 7bbThe Head of Delegation personally designates experts from their country or organization  X'but, in addition, formally delegates#XN\  P0XP# to bodies in their country or organization, the  X.'opportunity to designate experts. #b 7bb7 Example: The Head of Delegation names an expert from the national EAN organization to the Codes Working Group, but delegates to the national trade facilitation organization the designation of experts to the International Trade Procedures Working Group and to the national EDI organization the designation of experts to other groups.#  X 4#XN\  P1XP#bb  X 4 2)7bbThe Head of Delegation personally designates experts from their country or organisation but also delegates to a regional or international body active in CEFACTs work, (which  X+'may or may not be accredited) the opportunity to designate experts. #b 7bb7 Example: The Head of Delegation names a number of national experts to all the mandated groups but, in addition, delegates the opportunity to name experts to  Xp4the UN/EDIFACT Working Group to a regional body#XN\  P2XP#, such as the Asia EDIFACT Board. #  X' 3)7bbThe Head of Delegation delegates to a regional or international body active in CEFACTs work, (which may or may not be accredited) their powers of designation.#b  X4 bbn Example: The Head of Delegation does not name any experts themselves, but delegates to a regional trade facilitation body, such as the EUROPROS, the opportunity to name experts to the ITPWG and the naming of experts to the EWG to a separate regional body such as EBES.#  Xm4The above options are only a few of the scenarios that could be envisaged. In addition, #XN\  P3XP#the Head of Delegation may decide to use different options for different mandated groups.  X"4#XN\  P4XP#  X#'  X%'#XN\  P5XP#"%G1,,jj"/"  `4m#[\  P6jP#ANNEX C   `|4 CEFACT Steering Group Resolutions#XN\  P7XP# f+  X' Resolution CSG/1997/1  X'  X- 'RESOLUTION ON THE USE OF BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MODELLING The UN/CEFACT Steering Group (CSG) resolves that business and information modelling is an essential requirement to the future of UN/EDIFACT and that the implementation of business and information modelling is a critical objective of the CEFACT strategy and its attendant work programme. Accordingly, the CSG further resolves that all new United Nations Standard Messages (UNSMs) submitted as a Message in Development (MiD) shall utilise modelling as a condition of submission and approval commencing at a date to be jointly agreed by the CSG and the UN/EDIFACT Working Group (EWG). In support of this resolution, the CSG requests that the EWG, after considering an analysis and impact study provided by the Techniques & Methodologies Working Group (TMWG), submit their comments, and in consultation with TMWG, a proposed target commencement date to the CSG not later than 1 June 1998. _________________  X' Resolution CSG/1997/2  X'RESOLUTION ON ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION IN WORKING GROUPS The UN/CEFACT Steering Group (CSG) strongly encourages all working groups to expand participation in their work programme through the use of electronic means to progress their work.  & #XN\  P8XP#y: -ddd>y