INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION
on the
simplification and harmonization
of Customs procedures
(Kyoto, 18 May 1973)
| I. | Text and Commentary | |
|---|---|---|
| Preambule | ||
| Chapter I: | ||
| Definitions (Article 1) | ||
| Chapter II: | ||
| Scope of the Convention and structure of the Annexes (Articles 2-5) | ||
| Scope of the Convention (Article 2) | ||
| Prohibitions or restrictions imposed under national legislation (Article 3) | ||
| Structure of the Annexes (Article 4) | ||
| Acceptance of the Annexes and entering of reservations (Article 5) | ||
| Chapter III: | ||
| Role of the Council and of the Permanent Technical Committee (Articles 6 and 7) | ||
| Chapter IV: | ||
| Miscellaneous provisions (Articles 8 and 9) | ||
| Relationship between the body of the Convention and the Annexes (Article 8) | ||
| Contracting Parties forming a Customs or Economic Union (Article 9) | ||
| Chapter V: | ||
| Final provisions (Articles 10-19) | ||
| Settlement of disputes between Contracting Parties (Article 10) | ||
| Signature, ratification and accession; acceptance of Annexes (Article 11) | ||
| Entry into force (Article 12) | ||
| Amending Supplement, April 1978] | ||
| Territorial scope of the Convention (Article 13) | ||
| Denunciation (Article 14) | ||
| Procedure for amendment of the Convention and its Annexes (Articles 15 and 16) | ||
| Amendments recommended by the Council (Article 15) | ||
| Amendments decided on by the Council (Article 16) | ||
| Acceptance of amendments already in force (Article 17) | ||
| Notifications to be made by the Secretary General of the Council (Article 18) | ||
| Registration and signature of the Convention (Article 19) | ||
| II. | Entry into force | |
| Dates of entry into force | ||
| Contracting Parties | ||
| III. | Obligations of Contracting Parties as regards notifications | |
| IV. | Extensions | |
Noting that divergences between national Customs procedures¹ can hamper international trade and other international exchanges,
Considering that it is in the interests of all countries to promote such trade and exchanges and to foster international co-operation,
Considering that simplification and harmonization of their Customs procedures can effectively contribute to the development of international trade and of other international exchanges,
Convinced that an international instrument proposing provisions which countries undertake to apply as soon as they are able to do so would lead progressively to a high degree of simplification and harmonization of Customs procedures, which is one of the essential aims of the Customs Co-operation Council,
Have agreed as follows:
Article 1
| (a) | the term "the Council" means the Organization set up by the Convention establishing a Customs Co-operation Council, done at Brussels on 15 December 1950; |
| (b) | the term "Permanent Technical Committee" means the Permanent Technical Committee of the Council; |
| (c) | the term "ratification" means ratification, acceptance or approval ². |
| (a) | an introduction summarizing the various matters dealt with in the Annex ²; |
| (b) | definitions of the main Customs terms used in the Annex ³; |
| (c) | Standards, being those provisions the general application of which is recognized as
necessary for the achievement of harmonization and simplification of Customs
procedures .
|
| (d) | Recommended Practices, being those provisions which are recognized as constituting
progress towards the harmonization and the simplification of Customs procedures, the
widest possible application of which is considered to be desirable ;
|
| (e) | Notes, indicating some of the possible courses of action to be followed in applying the
Standard or Recommended Practice concerned .
|
2. Each Contracting Party bound by an Annex shall at least once every three years review the Standards and Recommended Practices therein in respect of which it has entered reservations, compare them with the-provisions of its national legislation and notify the Secretary General of the Council of the results of that review.
2. To these ends the Permanent Technical Committee shall, under the authority of the
Council, and in accordance with any directions given by the Council, have the
following functions:
| (a) | to prepare new Annexes and to propose to the Council their adoption with a view to their incorporation in the Convention; |
| (b) | to submit to the Council proposals for such amendments to this Convention or to its Annexes as it may consider necessary and, in particular, proposals for amendments to the texts of the Standards and Recommended Practices and for the upgrading of Recommended Practices to Standards; |
| (c) | to furnish opinions on any matters concerning the application of the Convention²; |
| (d) | to perform such tasks as the Council may direct in relation to the provisions of the Convention. |
² Definition of the term "ratification" facilitates the drafting of the final provisions of the Convention by avoiding the need to repeat the terms ratification, acceptance and approval in several Articles. It is nevertheless to be understood that the internal legal provisions of individual States concerning the conditions to be met before the competent national authorities may decide on the international instrument declaring the State's willingness to be bound remain applicable. The definition of ratification makes it possible for each State to choose the procedure it prefers for undertaking commitments at international level. It is noteworthy also that the definition given corresponds to the provisions of Article 2 (I) (b) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969.
² Article 2 sets forth the principle that the Contracting Parties give a general undertaking to conform to the Standards and Recommended Practices set out in the Annexes. This undertaking does not mean that all the provisions of the Annexes will have to be applied by Contracting Parties forthwith. In fact, Contracting Parties are free to accept only a limited number of Annexes. They may also refrain from applying all the Standards and Recommended Practices contained in an Annex which they have accepted, provided that they enter appropriate reservations in respect of the provisions concerned.
³ The facilities provided for in the Annexes are the minimum facilities that the Contracting Parties undertake to grant.
Contracting Parties will not, therefore, be able to cite the provisions of the Convention as justification for withdrawing or limiting facilities granted hitherto under their national legislations.
Furthermore, States remain entirely free to provide in their national legislations for cases not expressly covered by the Convention.
² Contracting Parties have the right to apply all prohibitions and restrictions deriving from their national legislations, i.e. not only those based on considerations of public morality or order public security, public hygiene or health, or veterinary or phytopathological considerations, or relating to the protection of patents, trade marks and copyrights, but also those imposed on economic or any other grounds.
³ It may, however, be recommended, in any given Annex, that economic prohibitions or restrictions should be waived Where Contracting Parties have undertaken to apply the clause in a particular Annex providing for the non-application of economic prohibitions and restrictions, they cannot use Article 3 as justification for applying such prohibitions or restrictions (see also commentary (1) on Article 5 below).
² The Introduction gives a brief account of the economic and administrative reasons underlying the institution of the particular Customs procedure concerned, and describes its scope. It is not intended to impose special obligations on Contracting Parties, which are hence not required to accept it or to enter reservations in respect of its content.
³ Contracting Parties cannot enter reservations in respect of the definitions. Uniform application of the definitions is considered essential to achieve the harmonization of the Customs procedure to which the Annex relates.
The Standards and Recommended Practices have the same legal value in that the obligations deriving from the
acceptance of these provisions by Contracting Parties are the same. However, it was considered preferable to
adopt different designations for the two types of provisions, which differ mainly in the extent to which they
can be expected to contribute towards the harmonization and simplification of Customs procedures.
Application of the Standards is recognized as necessary in order to achieve harmonization and simplification of the Customs procedure concerned-application of the Recommended Practices, on the other hand, is seen as a desirable means of progressing towards that aim.
To give a clearer picture of the respective scopes of the Standards and the Recommended Practices, they have been worded differently: the imperative mood has been used for the Standards, while the conditional was felt to be more appropriate for the Recommended Practices. As the Recommended Practices become generally accepted it will be possible to upgrade them gradually to Standards.
The Notes are not intended to specify the scope of the commitments of the Contracting Parties. They are
intended only to assist Contracting Parties by describing some of the ways in which the Standards and Recommended Practices to which they relate may be applied in practice. They entail no particular obligations
for the Contracting Parties, which need neither explicitly accept them nor enter reservations in respect of them.
On the other hand, if a Contracting Party which has accepted a particular Annex is unable to apply one or more provisions thereof by reason of the existence of prohibitions and restrictions other than those listed above (e.g. economic), it is bound to enter reservations in respect of such provisions. It need not, however, give details of the goods subject to these prohibitions and restrictions, as this would complicate the administration of the Convention to no purpose.
² The notification of differences between the national legislations of Contracting Parties and the provisions of the Annexes serves two purposes. It encourages Contracting Parties to modify their national legislations to bring them into line with the provisions of the Annexes, and it provides the Secretariat with the necessary facts for updating the information about the practical application of the Annexes in the territories of the Contracting Parties.
However, in order to avoid placing Contracting Parties that are not Members of the Council at a disadvantage, special provisions have been inserted in the Convention to associate them with the future work of the Council and the PTC in the development and administration of the Convention. Although these Contracting Parties do not have the right to vote at Council and PTC meetings, they are entitled to submit their comments on any proposed amendment to the Convention. They may even object to the adoption of amendments to the body of the Convention or to the definitions contained in the Annexes. (See below: Procedure for amendment of the Convention and its Annexes--Articles 15 and 16). Although the Convention makes no provision for participation by Contracting Parties that are not Council Members in the preparation of new Annexes, they will of course be invited, having regard to their manifest interest in the Convention, to all meetings whose agenda includes the preparation of a new Annex.
² The PTC may also furnish opinions on any matters concerning the application of the Convention, at the request either of the Contracting Parties or of the interested international organizations. If it thinks fit, the PTC may use the advance approval procedure provided for in Council Decision No. 174 of June 1968. This procedure is applicable to "drafts prepared by the PTC concerning, for example, opinions relating to the interpretation and application of Conventions on matters of Customs technique sponsored by the Council or relating to matters of Customs technique contained in other Conventions".
Thus, by virtue of the present Article 7, together with Article VIII of the Convention establishing the Council, each Member of the Council is entitled to one vote in voting on drafts of new Annexes.
It is pointed out that the insertion of a new Annex is not to be regarded as an amendment to the Convention. Provision for such insertions, which is made in Article 6, paragraph 1, cannot, therefore, be made by the amendment procedure prescribed in Article 15 or 16.
Article VIII of the Convention establishing the Council further specifies that a Member of the Council shall not have a vote on any question relating to the interpretation, application or amendment of any Convention which is in force and which does not apply to that Member.
This means that only Members of the Council that are Contracting Parties to the Convention will be entitled to vote on matters relating to the interpretation, application or amendment of the body of the Convention. As regards matters concerning an Annex which is already in force, only those Members of the Council that have accepted that Annex will have the right to vote. For Contracting Parties that are not Members of the Council, see commentary (2) on Article 15.
Finally, the conditions governing determination of the quorum and of the majority required for adoption of the drafts are the same as those prescribed in the Convention establishing the Council and in the Rules of Procedure both of the Council and of the PTC.
² This obligation to enter reservations was introduced to enable the Council Secretariat to inform all the Parties concerned of the situation with respect to application of the Annex in question in the territory of such Contracting Parties.
It should be noted that under Article 11, paragraph 7, the competent bodies of Customs or Economic Unions may become Contracting Parties to the Convention but are not entitled to vote.
Top of this page
Return to beginning of Kyoto Convention