UNUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe

Press Release

[Index]      

COMBATING COUNTERFEIT GOODS ON INTERNATIONAL MARKETS:
UN BODY EXPLORES NEW SOLUTIONS

Geneva, 26 October 2005 - With the rapid movement of goods in our global economy, counterfeit and unsafe products are arriving in ever greater quantities on national markets and posing a major challenge for countries worldwide. As counterfeit goods flood markets, they are undermining our economies, depriving Governments of revenue from taxes, and often endangering the health and safety of consumers. Some of these goods can even be life-threatening – such as adulterated or contaminated food, hazardous toys or falsified spare parts for electrical goods, cars or aircraft. Counterfeits goods, according to the World Customs Organization, now account for around 5-7% of international trade.

To examine how current market surveillance activities could be expanded to provide better consumer protection, delegates from 42 countries met on 24 and 25 October at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) during its Second International Forum on Market Surveillance and Consumer Protection. The 110 participants included representatives of national and international standards organizations, patent offices, consumer protection agencies, regulators, and industry.

The Forum’s purpose was to work towards finding a consensus on how to approach the issues of consumer safety and protection and the fight against fraud through a “broader concept” of market surveillance. A draft recommendation was circulated for comment and by June 2006, the UNECE hopes that a formal UNECE Recommendation on Market Surveillance can be agreed.

A second objective of the Forum was to help public authorities from countries in transition and developing countries to obtain first-hand information on how to protect human health and safety, animal and plant life and health, as well as the environment, without introducing trade restrictive practices.

Counterfeiting is not only an infringement of the intellectual property rights of individuals and companies, it creates a disincentive for investors and hinders economic development. Today, profits from counterfeit products such as CDs and DVDs are greater than those from heroin. With jail sentences considerably shorter than for drugs, criminals are finding this type of business less risky.

Some success stories in combating this type of crime were reported during the Forum. In Ukraine, for instance, the authorities working together with Procter and Gamble, successfully detected and destroyed a lucrative illegal market in counterfeit Procter and Gamble products. In a survey conducted by Procter and Gamble in Ukraine in 1999, that company had found that a staggering 43 per cent of the hair-care products and 23 per cent of the laundry products using its brand names were counterfeit.

As a result of an intense campaign that consisted of public confidence building and deploying mobile testing laboratories in Ukraine for on-the-spot testing of suspect products, the company jointly with the Ukrainian authorities succeeded in completely eliminating the counterfeit products.

Among the numerous concerns expressed during the Forum were difficulties in controlling misleading or false language. A representative of an Australia/New Zealand regulatory office highlighted the difficulty of controlling the language of marketing; specifically when statements about products were “true but misleading”.

The Chairman of the Working Party, Christer Arvius, explained that the lack of terminology and appropriate definitions in the area of market surveillance was also a problem. In many countries, market surveillance focuses mainly on product safety. In Western Europe, for instance, the authorities concentrate on controlling product safety: e.g. food, motor vehicles, children’s toys. In other countries, the focus can be more on quality standards. The powers of the various bodies involved in carrying out searches for fraudulent or illegal goods also varied considerably from one country to another. In order for countries to adequately share information about market surveillance practices and results, a common vocabulary is needed and it was agreed that this is an area where the UNECE will undertake future work.

The Forum was part of the 35th anniversary meeting of the UNECE Working Party on Regulatory Cooperation and Standardization Policies (24-26 October 2005).

For further information, contact:

Serguei Kouzmine
UNECE Trade Development and Timber Division
Palais des Nations, office 433-1
CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Tel.: +41 (0) 22 917 27 71
Fax: +41 (0) 22 917 04 79 /917 00 37
E-mail: [email protected]

Website: http://www.unece.org/trade

Presentations at the Forum: http://www.unece.org/trade/ctied/wp6/other_events/fora.htm

Read about the MARS Group’s activities, as well as related activities of the Working Party: http://www.unece.org/trade/ctied/wp6/sectoral/mars/mars_bkgrd.htm

UK Patent Office links page: http://www.patent.gov.uk/links/index.htm

Ref: ECE/TRADE/05/P07