UNUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe

[Index]      

Geneva, 13 June 2003

Statistical confidentiality:
how to avoid the “big brother” effect of statistics while meeting governments’ and researchers’ needs for detailed data?

How to find a balance between providing an increased access to very detailed data (microdata) without producing a negative effect on the protection of privacy and confidentiality of individuals – this was the main topic for discussion of Heads of national and international statistical offices at the Seminar Session on “Statistical Confidentiality and Microdata” which took place at the Conference of European Statisticians1 this June. Various aspects of statistical data confidentiality – legal, organizational, methodological and technical – were considered.

The confidentiality principle is one of the cornerstones of official statistics. Statistical offices collect large amounts of data through surveys and censuses and make use of various administrative records. When collecting data through surveys, the offices make a promise to respondents to protect their privacy: whatever the respondents reply in the questionnaires is to remain confidential. Traditionally, only aggregate statistics were disseminated where information about individuals, be it persons or enterprises, cannot be disclosed to any third party – and in particular not to tax authorities or other government agencies.

However, there is a wealth of detailed data available in statistical offices that could be invaluable for tailor-made statistics necessary for research, policy-making, local planning, etc. If these data can be used, while still protecting privacy, the economy, society and citizens would gain. Alongside research, a strong driving force for more data is the increasing demand for accountable government and transparency. Developing evidence-based policies and monitoring their impact requires analysis on a much more detailed level than presently published by statistical agencies.

The challenge is to strike the right balance between increased data dissemination and confidentiality protection. This dilemma lies at the heart of official statistics. On the one hand, official statistics should serve the government, economy and public with data, and it is in the interest of statistical offices to disseminate as much as possible. On the other hand, they have to guarantee the confidentiality of individual data collected to maintain the trust of respondents. An optimal solution can be found only by combining the different measures and actions of confidentiality protection: legal, organizational, methodological and technical. Individual data (microdata) can be released in such a way that it is virtually impossible to recognize a concrete individual from the data.

In general, statistical offices take quite a conservative attitude to dissemination of microdata but along with the improvement of technological methods to guarantee confidentiality, they are increasingly opening up to a greater dissemination of detailed data.

The Heads of statistical offices also discussed the specific concerns of central and eastern European and the CIS countries about data confidentiality. EU accession countries have mostly brought their legal framework on confidentiality protection in line with the EU requirements. Some of the south-east European and CIS countries are in the process of establishing the required legal basis. In some CIS countries, problems still arise because of the pressure from other government bodies to gain access to microdata. Emerging from a past where official statistics followed a completely different paradigm, its role is often not fully understood by other government agencies. Unresolved technical aspects, lack of special software and the low level of technological equipment in local statistical offices sometimes make it difficult to ensure data protection at the required level. However, the statistical offices of these countries are committed to resolve the problems of confidentiality protection.


The methods demonstrated show that it is possible to allow access to microdata and protect the privacy of individuals at the same time. Developing international standards for a wide variety of possible methods of access will be beneficial both for the research community and the countries that are setting up their legal and technological basis. Official statistics are dealing seriously with any confidentiality concerns, and we can expect an increasing use of microdata-based research and policy making in the near future.

All papers from the Seminar session are available at the web site:

http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2003.06.ces.htm


For more information, please contact:

Heinrich Brüngger
Director of the Statistical Division
UN Economic Commission for Europe
Palais des Nations
CH – 1211 Geneva 10

Tel: +41 (0) 22 917 12 71
Fax: +41 (0) 22 917 00 40
E-mail: [email protected]

__________

1 The Conference of European Statisticians (CES) is composed of the Heads of national statistical offices of UNECE member countries and international statistical organizations who meet annually to discuss the most important problems and developments in statistics.

Ref: ECE/STAT/03/N01