Twelfth OSCE Economic Forum
Towards a Strengthened Partnership: the
Future of
UNECE–OSCE Cooperation
Prague, Czech Republic, 31 May 2004
Statement by Ms. Brigita
Schmögnerová,
Executive Secretary
Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am greatly honoured
by the invitation to make a presentation
at the opening session of the 12th OSCE
Economic Forum. I wish further success to
the Bulgarian Chairmanship and I am looking
forward to close cooperation with the incoming
Slovenian Chairmanship.
The topic of this year’s
Forum: “Building up institutional
and human capacity for economic development
and cooperation” integrates many crucial
aspects of security: economic development,
education, public institutions and conflict
prevention. The UN has increasingly focused
on these issues since 1990, the year the
first UNDP Human Development Report was
launched. The goal is simple: “putting
people back at the centre of the development
process in terms of economic debate, policy
and advocacy”. The UN Human Development
Index is now used on a regular basis to
assess the state of human capital in an
individual country.
The UNECE has consistently
argued that more attention be given to the
contribution which institutions and human
capital make to economic development. In
keeping with the wishes of the OSCE participating
States it is important to examine the topic
of this year’s Forum in a security,
as well as in the economic context. Building
the institutional framework for successful
development not only takes long time and
requires significant resources, but it also
necessitates commitment by policy makers.
It is a lengthy and challenging process,
but the quality of domestic institutions
is one of the key factors of economic success
and prosperity.
In the process of turning
our economies into knowledge-based ones,
human resources have become key. Economic
competitiveness of countries is increasingly
dependent on investment in education and
research and development. According to the
World Economic Forum the most competitive
economies are Finland, the United States
and other Northern European economies that
invest most in education and R and D. In
this context, I would like to note that
investments in education and R and D in
those OSCE member States, which are in different
stages of transition, including post-transition
economies – with a very few exceptions
– is not satisfactory. In addition
to it, these economies are affected by ”brain-drain”
that further undermines their competitiveness.
I am afraid that countries of origin do
not recognize adequately this aspect of
migration.
Allow me to briefly touch
on yet another aspect of human resources.
In the context of transition from plan to
market, it is generally more difficult to
build the human capacity in the public sector.
The private sector demands solid professional
and management skills and so does the public
sector but, generally, the private sector
supplies better-paid job opportunities.
As a result, the private sector draws the
most skilled like a magnet, at times inducing
departure of the youngest, brightest and
most educated away from the public sector.
This “brain drain”
may have negative implications and should
be addressed. It is generally recognized
that good governance is a precondition of
successful economic development. Good governance
in turn depends on the quality of human
resources in the public sector. Governments
could make commitments to reforms that make
the public sector which plays a limited
but important role in modern market economies
perform more effectively.
Mr. Chairman,
By adopting the Strategy
Document the participating States of the
OSCE expressed their strong wish to react
more effectively and in a more coherent
way to new threats and challenges to security
in the economic and environmental dimension.
The Strategy Document, in addition to significantly
broadening the number and scope of commitments,
gives a mandate to the OSCE to develop new
approaches and to forge a closer partnership
with UNECE. I am grateful to the member
States for strongly supporting our efforts
to build this new partnership.
The UNECE is making sincere
and serious efforts to lay a solid foundation
for a new and deeper relationship with the
OSCE and provide greater assistance to the
OSCE in the economic and environmental dimension
of security. The setting up of an Inter
Secretariat Task Force and the videoconferences
held between the two Secretariats were the
first steps. In addition, the UNECE team
of the Inter Secretariat Task Force has
prepared a number of documents on main areas
of our cooperation, including studies on
the methodology of the review, the draft
MoU and a paper on early warning indicators
and mechanisms.
Let me share with you our
vision of a new, strengthened partnership
with the OSCE.
The Strategy Document calls for an improved
review of the implementation of commitments.
The UNECE has therefore undertaken serious
analytical work. Our team in the Inter Secretariat
Task Force has developed novel approaches
to the review, based on the combination
of a number of methods. It has divided the
commitments into clusters in order to facilitate
better planning and management of the review
process. The UNECE in-house expertise covers
a significant part of the present, much
broader set of commitments but not all of
them. The UNECE Secretariat during the videoconferences
expressed its readiness to take the lead
in the review of commitments in two clusters:
integration, trade and transport and investment
climate.
Last Friday, at the Ad
Hoc Session of the UNECE the EU Presidency,
speaking on behalf of the EU member States
and other associated States, supported by
others, including the Russian Delegation
called for UNECE to take the leadership
in the review of commitments related to
the environment, energy and sustainable
development. It is the prerogative of the
UNECE and OSCE member States to agree on
any division of labour between the two organisations,
taking into consideration all implications.
As I already underlined the UNECE Secretariat
is committed to meeting your request. At
present, it is ready to continue to do this
within its existing resources. In case the
UNECE is asked to contribute beyond its
existing resources it is ready to do it
on a project basis. The UNECE Secretariat
is prepared to contribute to the review
of other commitments too, in particular
those concerning good governance to the
extent it has relevant in-house expertise.
It is likely, however, that other international
organisations and institutions will have
to be involved in the review process in
order to guarantee its quality and professionalism.
Effective coordination and leadership throughout
the process is an important precondition
of success.
The primary objective of
the UNECE Task Force was to offer new approaches,
matching the complexity of the task. It
developed a number of substantive proposals
with the clear understanding that decision
on the structure, methodology and resource
implications would have to be taken by the
OSCE. It would be a misinterpretation to
narrow down this work to resource issues.
I also believe there is
a need to mobilize new stakeholders so that
they can participate effectively in the
review sessions. The OSCE Strategy Document
calls for new partnerships and the involvement
of academia, the business community and
civil society. Their contributions would
make the review sessions more interactive,
informative and relevant.
Cooperation between the
UNECE and OSCE could be extended to a more
systematic follow-up of the annual review
sessions, including joint formulation and
implementation of policy recommendations
based on the review. Take as an example
this year’s review. UNECE and OSCE
experts together with representatives of
other partners could jointly develop a series
of policy recommendations on improving the
investment climate. Moreover, the UNECE
is also prepared to participate in the implementation
of policy recommendations for the improvement
of investment climate.
The planned joint work
on an early warning mechanism in the economic
and environmental dimension is expected
to result in an increased capacity of our
organisations to contribute to the stabilisation
strategies of the international community.
A new, regionally focused early warning
mechanism in the economic and environmental
dimension, adapted to the challenges and
threats of the 21st century should lead
to increased synergies. Its full integration
with early warning activities of the OSCE
and other partners in other dimensions of
security should result in a highly efficient
new tool jointly owned by all 55 member
States of our organisations. The UNECE,
in addition, is ready to provide assistance
to the improvement of local statistical
and analytical capabilities and fostering
transparency when necessary – which
are key preconditions for the effective
functioning of any early warning mechanism.
The UNECE would like to
become a more effective partner of the OSCE
in the field. The two organisations have
some experience in this aspect. To illustrate
it, I would like to mention our cooperation
in the implementation of the Aarhus convention.
I hope we can broaden this cooperation,
in particular in the implementation of those
projects where the UNECE has readily available
in-house expertise. The more active involvement
of UNECE experts – in addition to
lowering costs and guaranteeing a high level
of professionalism – would ensure
complementarity with ongoing programmes
and projects of other UN organisations.
Joint fundraising could ensure adequate
resources for new UNECE-OSCE activities.
Designation of UNECE contact points in every
OSCE field missions would help making our
cooperation in the field simple and efficient.
I am convinced that an
enhanced UNECE-OSCE partnership will bring
significant added value in such strategically
important sub-regions as Central Asia and
the Caucasus. In February this year Secretary
General Kofi Annan contacted the Presidents
of the five Central Asian States and Azerbaijan
calling on them to use more actively the
framework of the United Nations Special
Programme for the Economies of Central Asia
for strengthening sub-regional cooperation
and integration. As a result, I have just
visited two Central Asian States –
Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan – and
from Prague I will travel to Tajikistan.
The UNECE – together with the UN Economic
and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
is now in the process of developing a new
strategic approach to Central Asia. This
week the strategic approach will be discussed
by representatives of SPECA member States
at the meeting of the Regional Advisory
Committee in Dushanbe. The Regional Commissions
wish to offer more active support to the
efforts of the States of the sub-region
to tackle together such problems as improving
the investment climate, transport, trade,
customs or water and energy. Afghanistan
could also be invited to join the SPECA
framework – first as an observer –
if member States wish so. Such an invitation
would greatly facilitate international efforts
to stabilise Afghanistan. There can be no
doubt that broader economic cooperation
and improved transport links between Central
Asia and Afghanistan would serve the interest
of all parties.
The dramatic spread of
global challenges to security, ranging from
terrorism to organised crime, from illegal
migration to environmental degradation makes
regular information exchange and coordination
among global and regional players a vital
necessity. The efforts of UNECE and OSCE
to better integrate the economic and environmental
dimension of security into overall regional
stabilisation efforts deserves the attention
of partners worldwide. As a member of the
UN family, the UNECE promises to share the
experience of this unique cooperation with
other regional commissions as well as relevant
UN agencies and funds.
This year’s Economic
Forum offers an excellent opportunity for
Delegations and representatives of the two
Secretariats to conduct an open and constructive
dialogue on all relevant issues and clarify
possible differences. Let me reconfirm the
full readiness of the UNECE Secretariat
to bring this work to an early and fruitful
conclusion.
_________