Case status: Inadmissible.
Follow-up: -
Topics: Protection of environmental defenders; Public participation; Access to justice.
Articles alleged: 3 (8); 6; 9.
Articles considered by the Committee: -
Articles, if any, found in non-compliance: -
Summary: The communication was submitted to the Compliance Committee on 20 May 2019 by two NGOs, two individuals and Greenpeace Energy e.G. The communication alleged a failure to comply with articles 3 (8), 6 and 9 of the Convention in connection with the construction of the Paks II nuclear power plant.
Documents | Status | Date received or posted by the secretariat |
---|---|---|
Communication Annex 1: Paks II Decision Annex 2: Extracts from the Paks Decision Annex 3: Extracts and dates from the Paks Decision Annex 4: Comments from Jan Haverkamp Annex 5: Comments from Oekologie Institut Annex 6: Curia Decision Annex 7: Email with Brigitte Artmann ENG GER Annex 8: Letters from the Hungarian authorities |
From the communicants | 20.05.2019 |
Comments on preliminary admissibility | From the Party concerned | 28.06.2019 |
Email to parties regarding outcome of 64th meeting | From the secretariat | 15.07.2019 |
Letter enclosing questions from the Committee to the parties regarding available domestic remedies | From the secretariat | 04.10.2019 |
Reply to the Committee's questions | From the communicants | 28.10.2019 |
Reply to the Committee’s questions Annex 1: Public Participation Directive Annex 2: Judgment in Case No. 24.K.3064 7/2006/20 HUN and ENG (extracts) Annex 3: Decision No. 1/2019, KMJE of January 2019 |
From the Party concerned | 31.10.2019 |
Additional comments regarding admissibility | From the Party concerned | 04.11.2019 |
Statement concerning admissibility | From the communicants | 04.11.2019 |
Email notifying the parties of the Committee’s determination that communication is inadmissible | From the secretariat | 14.11.2019 |