Prague, (Czech Republic)
Document Title | ENG | FRE | RUS |
|---|---|---|---|
Introduction to the training session– Convention secretariat | - | ||
PART I: Administrative structures for addressing major hazard prevention: | |||
Set of procedures (legislation, standards) and roles of authorities prior to implementing integrated approach to major hazard prevention in the Czech Republic – Mr. Milos Palecek (Occupational Safety Research Institute) | - | ||
Shortcomings and limitations hindering the attainment of better results in major hazard prevention (implementation of the Convention and the Seveso II Directive) prior to implementing integrated approach – Mr. Pavel Forint (Ministry of Environment) | - | ||
Integrated approach for major hazard prevention in the Czech Republic | |||
Legal and administrative framework within the Czech integrated approach for major hazard prevention (implementing the Convention and Seveso II Directive) – Act 59/2006 and supporting documents – Ms. Martina Prazakova, Mr. Jan Bumba (Occupational Safety Research Institute) | - | ||
Roles of owners/managers and employees of hazardous activities arising from the legislation – Mr. Vilem Sluka (Occupational Safety Research Institute) | - | ||
Safety documentation and its evaluation – Mr. Sluka | - | ||
Roles of the Ministry of Environment, inspection bodies and local authorities within the integrated approach for major hazard prevention in the Czech Republic – Ms. Martina Prazakova | - | ||
Education in the field of major hazard prevention – Ms. Martina Prazakova | - | ||
PART II: Inspections within the integrated approach in the Czech Republic | |||
Organization of inspections in the field of major hazard prevention in the Czech Republic – Ms. Zuzana Machatova (Ministry of Environment) | - | ||
Planning and briefing on inspections – Ms. Martina Pazourova (Czech Environmental Inspectorate) | - | ||
Labour inspection in the integrated approach – Mr. Jan Strouhal (Regional Labour Inspectorate) | - | ||
Case study of the Draslovka Kolin hazardous facility – safety inspection, conclusions and lessons learned from the accident, and the inspection regime following the accident – Mr. Hynek Benes, Mr. Bohumir Ruzicka, Mr. Jaroslav Dusek (Czech Environmental Inspectorate) - Part 1 | - | ||
Part 2 | - | ||
Part 3 | - | ||
PART III: Cross-border activities | |||
Cross-border cooperation arising from the Convention – Mr. Lukasz Wyrowski | - | ||
The importance of cross-border cooperation, including scientific and technological cooperation; benefits for the cooperating countries, Czech experience – Mr. Pavel Danihelka, Head, Laboratory of Risk Research and Management, Technical University of Ostrava | - | ||
Organization of response exercises in the transboundary regions, benefits and good practice | - | ||
Organization of response exercises in the transboundary regions, benefits and good practice | - | ||
Transboundary risk management; good practice from Commissions of Rhine, Elbe and Odra Rivers – Mr. Gerhard Winkelmann-Oei (Federal Environmental Agency of Germany) | - | - | - |
